Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

AwardScience review

#2 of 25 in Awards Management Software

A flexible awards platform with no-code workflows, AI judging, and automated communications.

9.1/10Editor score
AwardScience9.1 Visit AwardScience

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

AwardScience is a cloud-based platform for organizations managing awards, grants, scholarships, nominations, and recognition programs. It combines configurable application forms, automated workflow stages, judge assignment, blind and independent judging, communications, reporting, and public winner announcements. Its intended users include corporate awards teams, foundations, government and nonprofit organizations, scholarship managers, and accelerator programs that need structured administration across applications and judging.

Pricing starts with a 30-day Free Trial, which includes a no-code form and workflow builder, multilingual UI, 5 AI credits, and 200 automation runs. Essentials costs $149 per month when billed annually and adds email campaigns, a judging portal, and 500 AI credits. Pro costs $499 per month when billed annually and adds AI judging, document extraction, SMS and WhatsApp campaigns, and 2,000 AI credits. Enterprise includes unlimited applications, SSO and API access, private label and custom domain options, audit logs, an SLA, and a dedicated success manager. The platform’s standout depth is its judging workflow: AI-assisted scoring includes written reasoning, while anomaly and disagreement detection can highlight irregular judging patterns.

AwardScience also covers the operational layer with role-based permissions, audit trails, dashboards, branded public showcases, winner announcements, and public award-program pages. API access, webhooks, and single sign-on support integration and controlled access requirements, while multilingual capabilities and paid-submission workflows broaden its program fit. Organizations should choose it when automation, configurable processes, and AI-assisted review matter more than a simple intake form. Teams with strict certification requirements should assess the security posture carefully, since KYWH Limited does not hold ISO 27001 certification or a SOC 2 report.

AwardScience pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • No-code forms and workflows support complex award-program stages.
    • AI scoring, anomaly detection, and semantic similarity checks aid judging.
    • Email, SMS, WhatsApp, API, webhooks, and SSO support broad operations.
  • Where it doesn't
    • There is no permanent free plan after the 30-day trial.
    • Pro pricing rises to $499 per month when billed annually.
    • KYWH Limited does not hold ISO 27001 certification or a SOC 2 report.

AwardScience fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update