Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Antelope review

Free#29 of 32 in Blockchain Platforms

An open-source framework for building on Antelope networks or creating a blockchain.

6.3/10Editor score
Antelope6.3 Visit Antelope

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Antelope is an open-source blockchain framework for teams building Web3 applications or operating a customizable blockchain. Developers can build on existing EOS, Telos, WAX and UX networks, or use the codebase and tools to create a chain. Its use cases include decentralized finance, supply-chain systems, NFTs and games. The framework is suited to teams that want control over chain configuration and smart-contract development; it is less suited to buyers seeking a managed blockchain service or a turnkey deployment.

The technical focus is on delegated proof of stake, C++ smart-contract development and WebAssembly execution through EOS VM. Accounts, permissions and multisignature controls support application governance, while upgradeable smart-contract applications allow changes after deployment. Antelope also supports communication between Antelope networks. Solidity can run through compatible EVM deployments on Antelope-powered networks, rather than being described as the native contract-development route. This breadth is useful for teams committed to the Antelope ecosystem, but buyers seeking broad cross-chain interoperability should compare alternatives.

Antelope is self-hosted and open source, with documentation and community support channels. That model gives teams flexibility to operate and adapt the software, while placing infrastructure operations on their side. There is an important implementation distinction: the Leap repository says Leap is no longer supported and recommends Spring as the supported Antelope protocol implementation. Teams evaluating a deployment should account for that recommendation and identify the implementation they plan to run. Choose Antelope if your team can manage a self-hosted stack and wants to build on or operate an Antelope network; choose another option if you need vendor-managed operations or a different ecosystem.

Antelope pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Build on EOS, Telos, WAX or UX, or create a blockchain.
    • Develop smart contracts in C++ with WebAssembly execution through EOS VM.
    • Use accounts, permissions and multisignature controls.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Deployment is self-hosted, so teams need to operate their own infrastructure.
    • Inter-blockchain communication is between Antelope networks.
    • Leap is no longer supported; the repository recommends Spring.

Antelope fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update