iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The Supreme Court has appointed former Allahabad High Court judge Justice Sudhir Kumar Saxena to verify claims in the long-running Noida flat dispute. The single-member committee must identify genuine society members and assess their entitlements under the Court’s earlier directions, then submit a report within eight weeks, according to Hindustan Times.
What the committee will decide
The committee is to verify membership in Kendriya Karamchari Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti and determine which claimants qualify for benefits under the Supreme Court’s earlier judgment. Its appointment does not confirm that every person claiming membership or a transfer is eligible.
![India's Legal System: Can It Be Saved [Paperback] [Jan 01, 2017] Fali S.Nariman](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61N4uV54qHL._SL160_.jpg)
Hindustan Times reported on October 3, 2026, that a bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana appointed Saxena, invoking Article 142. The report says the committee may set its own procedure, request documents, and hear members and claimants.
Noida, the society, and claimants were directed to cooperate. Noida must provide secretarial and logistical support. The committee’s report is due within eight weeks. A further hearing is scheduled for December 2; the report does not specify the year for that date. The judge’s honorarium, payable by Noida, is to be determined at that hearing.
#1 Best Overall
What the 2022 judgment provided
The Supreme Court’s September 22, 2022 directions, as described by Hindustan Times, required Noida to develop a group-housing plot in Sector 43 and facilitate flats of approximately 1,800 square feet for 844 identified members, at prices applicable under Noida policy. The judgment also called for separate examination of claims by 133 subsequent purchasers, with similar benefits if they qualified.
The newly appointed committee’s task is to verify claims and help implement those directions. The 844 identified members and 133 subsequent purchasers are distinct categories; the latter group’s claims were left for separate examination.
Why the dispute has lasted decades
The society’s plot allotments began in the 1990s. Hindustan Times reported that 1,754 members deposited around ₹36 crore. After complaints of fake memberships, Noida conducted an inquiry and cancelled the allotments in May 1998. Litigation that followed involved land holdings, eligibility, alleged statutory violations, land acquisition, and ceiling proceedings.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Implementation of the 2022 directions has remained disputed, including over how many original members and subsequent purchasers should be considered and whether transfers were eligible. The figures reported at different stages are not interchangeable:
| Procedural point | Original members or allottees | Subsequent purchasers | Attribution in Hindustan Times |
|---|---|---|---|
| September 2022 directions | 844 identified members | 133 claims for separate examination | Supreme Court directions, as reported October 3, 2026 |
| July 2023 | 858 original allottees | 119 purchasers | Figures cited by the society |
| March 2024 | 863 original members | 120 purchasers | Figures recorded by the court |
Noida maintained that transfers required its prior permission and said refunds followed the 1998 cancellations. The society argued that Noida’s failure to act on transfer requests prevented it from obtaining permission, and that refund cheques were not encashed and the funds were not redeposited. The committee’s verification is intended to resolve competing claims; the appointment itself does not settle those disputes.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What happens next
- The committee may establish its procedure, seek supporting records, and hear the relevant members and claimants.
- Noida, the society, and claimants are expected to cooperate; Noida is responsible for the committee’s secretarial and logistical support.
- The committee must submit its report within eight weeks. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the matter again on December 2, although the report does not state the year.
The bench’s concern, as quoted by Hindustan Times, was that the process had remained inconclusive despite repeated affidavits and directions while original allottees had waited more than three decades for the outcome of the litigation. The committee is the Court’s new verification mechanism for deciding competing claims and moving implementation forward.
Quick Recap
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
