Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
New Zealand’s National Library removed books from its Overseas Published Collections and selected secure destruction for about 500,000 withdrawn publications. The Library says the collection was little used, rehoming had already been attempted, and it needed space for other collection priorities. But low borrowing does not establish that every item was replaceable or lacked cultural or research value—and the public record summarized here does not provide an item-by-item rarity audit or independent comparison of the costs and consequences of the alternatives.
This was a collection-management decision, not a legal book ban. “Burning” is a vivid description, but the Library’s stated method is secure destruction; the sources do not establish that the books were literally burned.
Which books were removed—and which collections were not?
The project concerned the National Library’s Overseas Published Collections (OPC), a lending collection of books published outside New Zealand. It did not cover all National Library holdings. The General Collections Removal Policy excludes Alexander Turnbull Library collections, which must remain in Crown ownership in perpetuity.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallThe figures describe different things: the project begun in 2018 covered about 600,000 books, while the Library says approximately 500,000 withdrawn books were ultimately disposed of. The project’s scope is not a count of books destroyed.
#1 Best Overall
- Used Book in Good Condition
How did the decision unfold?
| Date | What the Library reported |
|---|---|
| 2018 | The rehoming project began. The Library says the then Minister of Internal Affairs approved removal of items that no longer met the collection’s scope or purpose. |
| 2020 | The Library said it was halfway through the project, had retained more than 33,000 titles that met the collecting plan, and was offering books to libraries and community groups. It reported that 3,500 books had been used in the preceding year—less than 1% of the books then under review. This was an interim, one-year figure, not the later 2017–2020 usage measure. |
| 2020 | About 50,000 titles were offered at book fairs; the Library later described public uptake as modest. It also reported transferring approximately 15,000 collection titles to other libraries. |
| 2021–May 2025 | The Library entered a donation agreement with the Internet Archive to export remaining items to an offshore digitisation base, provide online access and retain physical copies. It says the project was paused over copyright concerns and the agreement was mutually terminated in May 2025. |
| 2024 | A General Collections Removal Policy was agreed following feedback and engagement. |
| April–11 June 2025 | The Library assessed the outcome for remaining withdrawn items against the new policy. On 11 June it publicly confirmed disposal of approximately 500,000 publications and said secure destruction was the most appropriate method. |
| September 2025–June 2026 | Approved monographs had been disposed of by September 2025. A project-page update dated 22 June 2026 said secure destruction of approved serials was underway. |
These milestones are from National Library project material and its 11 June 2025 announcement. The timeline shows a shift from the Library’s 2020 statement that “Not a single book has been destroyed as part of this project” and that it was trying to rehome them, to a later decision to destroy the remainder. The earlier statement described the position at that time, not the final outcome.
Why did the Library say the books should go?
The Library’s 11 June 2025 explanation cited low borrowing and the need to manage collection space for its functions and New Zealanders’ needs. It said less than 1% of the items involved had been borrowed during 2017–2020, and that most titles had not been issued for 20 to 30 years. Those are the institution’s usage claims, not an independent assessment of the collection’s value.
Usage can inform a lending decision, but it cannot by itself show whether a book is unique, difficult to find elsewhere, culturally significant, or likely to matter to future researchers. Nor does a borrowing rate explain how well inter-library loan met demand. The available figures do not establish how many of the disposed items were rare or unavailable elsewhere.
Rank #2
The Library Director of Content Services, Mark Crookston, said in the 2025 announcement: “Removing out-of-date and unused items from lending collections is not undertaken lightly and is part of good library collection management practice.” That describes the Library’s rationale. The sharper public-interest question is whether the case for removing lending stock also adequately addressed what would be lost when the remaining copies were disposed of.
Why not give the books away or digitise them?
The Library says it tried several routes to transfer or preserve access, but the public account does not provide a complete, independently costed comparison of them.
| Option | What is established | What the public account does not establish |
|---|---|---|
| Transfer to other libraries | The Library reported that approximately 15,000 titles went to other libraries. | It does not give an item-level account here of which titles were transferred, how many institutions could accept the remaining material, or the comparative handling and stewardship costs. |
| Public book fairs | About 50,000 titles were offered at fairs in 2020; the Library described uptake as modest. | The reported offer and uptake do not show whether a later, different distribution arrangement would have found stewards for more titles. |
| Internet Archive digitisation | The 2021 agreement contemplated offshore digitisation, online access and retention of physical copies. The Library says it paused the project over copyright concerns and mutually ended the agreement in May 2025. | The public explanation cited here does not set out the copyright advice, title-by-title rights status, or whether a different lawful digitisation route was feasible. |
| Secure destruction | After assessing remaining withdrawn items in April 2025, the Library selected secure destruction. Monograph disposal was completed by September 2025; approved serial disposal was underway in June 2026. | No independent comparative cost analysis or item-level audit of rarity and likely research value is established by the cited public account. |
Giving books away is not simply a matter of finding someone willing to take a box: a receiving institution must be able to accept, store, catalogue and steward the material. Digitisation raises separate copyright questions, and scanning does not itself grant permission to publish a work online. These are real constraints, but the public account summarized here does not quantify them against the value of keeping access open.
Rank #3
What rules governed removal and disposal?
The 2024 General Collections Removal Policy distinguishes two decisions. Under the policy, removal from the collection requires the National Librarian to obtain the Minister of Internal Affairs’ agreement under section 9(3) of the National Library of New Zealand Act 2003. After removal, the National Librarian decides how items are disposed of. The Library says the OPC removal decision had already been made under section 9(3), following due process; the new policy was used to assess the 2025 disposal outcome. It should not be treated as the rule that originally governed the 2018 removal decision.
The policy sets out tests against which the decision can be judged:
- Removal must be lawful and supported by at least one qualifying circumstance.
- Before recommending removal, the Library assesses effects on New Zealanders’ ongoing information and cultural needs and considers connections among items.
- “The cost of maintaining and storing items is not the primary driver for removal decisions.”
- For disposal, the National Librarian may consider transfer, sale, donation, destruction or another method.
- “Where more than one viable option is available, disposal actions that enable ongoing public access will be prioritised.” Disposal costs may still influence the choice.
- The process is expected to be transparent, with relevant advice, appropriate tikanga, records and an engagement summary; the policy also calls for maintaining relationships with people connected to items.
That framework makes the distinction between removal and disposal consequential. It also leaves concrete questions: which alternatives remained viable in April 2025, how was ongoing public access weighed against cost, and how were cultural and research effects assessed? The policy’s access preference applies where more than one option is viable; the public account cited here does not show the full evidence used to determine viability.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Was this censorship or a ban?
No. The Classification Office’s rules concern whether publications may legally be supplied or possessed, not whether a library retains an item in its own lending collection. Books and magazines do not generally have to be classified before being supplied to the public. A restricted publication, such as one classified R13 or R16, cannot legally be supplied to people below the relevant age, and display conditions must be followed. An objectionable publication is banned: supplying, importing or possessing it is illegal.
The Classification Office’s list of books banned in New Zealand, dated 22 September 2025, records that separate statutory process. The OPC decision was the National Library withdrawing and then disposing of its own lending stock; the evidence here does not say the books were banned or that the public was legally prohibited from obtaining them elsewhere.
Recommended Free Tools
What would make the decision easier to assess?
The Library has published its rationale, policy framework and timeline. A fuller public assessment would also need evidence that connects those general statements to the actual titles and the choices available for them:
- Item-level figures showing what was retained, transferred, offered, digitised or destroyed, and how rare or available elsewhere the remaining titles were.
- The assessment of effects on New Zealanders’ information and cultural needs, including how item relationships and potential research use were considered.
- The comparative costs and practical requirements for transfer, continued storage, lawful digitisation and secure destruction.
- The copyright advice and rights analysis behind ending the Internet Archive arrangement, and whether other lawful access options were viable.
- The engagement summary and relevant advice, alongside evidence-based responses from libraries, researchers, authors, copyright holders and groups concerned about the disposal.
The supplied public account does not settle whether that fuller evidence exists or what it would show. Without it, the most defensible conclusion is limited: the Library had tried transfers, book fairs and a digitisation arrangement, cited low use and collection priorities, and chose secure destruction for the remainder. Whether it adequately balanced those reasons against the loss of access and potential cultural or research value turns on evidence not established by the published figures alone.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
