iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Amazon Neptune is AWS’s managed graph database service, built for data where the connections between records matter as much as the records themselves. A September 16 DEV Community article titled “N for Nithish, N for Neptune: My AWS Deep Dive” introduces it through a college knowledge graph that links students, departments, courses, projects, faculty, and technologies. This article follows the same path, explains the graph ideas behind it, and separates what the source reports from what you should confirm on AWS’s own pages before you build on it.
Graphs in plain terms
A graph stores data as three kinds of things:
- Nodes (entities) are the things you track, such as a student, a department, or a technology.
- Edges (relationships) are the links between nodes, such as “student belongs to department” or “project uses technology.”
- Properties are descriptive attributes attached to a node or an edge, such as a student’s name or the year a project started.
The DEV article’s example makes the idea concrete. A student connects to a department, and that department connects to a technology the student works with. In a relational database, that path is usually spread across several tables and reassembled with joins. In a graph, the links are stored directly, so a question that follows a chain of relationships reads as a path through the data.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
The Son of Neptune (Heroes of Olympus, Book 2) | $8.49 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
The Rise of Neptune (The Dragonships Series) | $9.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 3 |
|
The Book of Neptune | $24.95 | Buy on Amazon |
| 4 |
|
The Neptune Project | $6.99 | Buy on Amazon |
| 5 |
|
Neptune's Fortune: The Billion-Dollar Shipwreck and the Ghosts of the Spanish Empire | $16.50 | Buy on Amazon |
That shape is the core argument for graphs. The article suggests it helps with questions in which the relationships are the point, not an afterthought. It does not offer a benchmark, so whether a graph is faster for your queries is something to measure rather than assume.
Recommended Free Tools
What Neptune is
Neptune is a managed database for connected data. You provision it on AWS, and AWS runs the underlying infrastructure, so your team focuses on the data model and queries rather than the database servers. The DEV article supports two graph models, each with its own query language:
#1 Best Overall
| Graph model | Query language | Status in the source article |
|---|---|---|
| Property graph | Gremlin | Listed as supported |
| Property graph | openCypher | Listed as supported |
| RDF graph | SPARQL | Listed as supported |
The article is the only source for this table. Language support can change, and the AWS Neptune documentation is the place to confirm which models and query languages apply to the version you would deploy.
The college knowledge graph example
The article’s example models a college. The table below shows the entity types it uses and the kinds of links its example implies between them.
| Entity (node) | Example relationships |
|---|---|
| Student | Belongs to a department; works on projects; takes courses |
| Department | Offers courses; includes faculty |
| Course | Offered by a department; taught to students |
| Project | Uses technologies; guided by faculty |
| Faculty | Belongs to a department; guides projects |
| Technology | Used in projects; associated with student skills |
The article illustrates the kind of question this structure is meant to answer. Two examples from its text:
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →- “What happens when the relationships between the data are just as important as the data itself?”
- “Show me projects related to Artificial Intelligence that use Python and were guided by faculty from the AIML department.”
The second question crosses four kinds of link at once: project to subject, project to technology, project to faculty, and faculty to department. Each hop is a relationship the graph stores directly.
Rank #3
The article also proposes several uses for a college graph. These are suggestions, not reported production results:
- Recommending projects and courses
- Matching faculty with projects
- Finding research collaborators
- Building skill graphs for students
- Matching students with internships
When a graph fits and when a relational database is simpler
The article is clear that a graph is not automatically the right choice. Its guidance points to these conditions:
Rank #4
- A graph is likely to fit when the questions follow chains of relationships of unknown or varying length, when the links between records change often, or when the connections are the main thing you need to explore.
- A relational database is likely to fit when the data is mostly simple records, the main queries are predictable lookups and reports, and the team already knows SQL and relational design well.
- Graph modeling takes effort. The article notes that designing a good graph model is itself a skill, and a poor model can cost more than it saves.
Capabilities the article reports
The DEV article describes Neptune as offering the following. These are the article’s account, and the AWS documentation should be checked for exact feature names, supported configurations, and security details before you rely on them.
- Read replicas
- Continuous backup and point-in-time recovery
- Replication across Availability Zones and automatic failover
- VPC isolation for network access
- Encryption, with access control through IAM and key management through KMS
The article also states that AWS describes Neptune as designed for greater than 99.99% availability. That figure is attributed to AWS in the article. I could not confirm the primary AWS source, its exact scope, or the year it was published, so treat it as a claim to verify, not as a settled specification.
Best Value
Serverless capacity and cost
The article says Neptune Serverless adjusts capacity to the workload and charges for the resources it consumes. It does not give prices, regions, minimums, or billing units, and I have not included any here. Current rates and regional availability are on the AWS pricing pages, and cost should be estimated at your expected data volume and query load rather than taken from a general description.
How to evaluate Neptune for your own workload
- List the five most important questions your application must answer. Mark which ones depend on following several relationships.
- Sketch the graph with a small sample of real data, using the node, edge, and property distinctions above.
- Check whether your team can work with the query language you would use, such as Gremlin, openCypher, or SPARQL.
- Build the same questions in a relational schema, so you compare both approaches on the same data.
- Estimate operating effort: who manages backups, failover tests, and access policies.
- Confirm availability terms, security controls, and supported configurations in the AWS Neptune documentation.
- Model cost at your expected scale using current AWS pricing for your region.
If the answers point toward relationship-heavy questions and the team can support a graph model, Neptune is a serious option. If most of your data is simple records queried in predictable ways, a relational database will usually be the simpler and less costly choice to start with.
The Bottom Line
Choose Neptune when the relationships in your data are the main thing you need to query, and your team can design and operate a graph model. For mostly simple records with predictable queries, start with a relational database. Verify the availability terms, feature list, and pricing on AWS’s own pages before committing.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
