The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
US AI policy is made through several overlapping federal channels: Congress enacts statutes, the President sets executive-branch priorities, and agencies implement laws and presidential direction within their authority. A bill, executive order, agency rule, memorandum, and policy plan have different legal force and scope; knowing which kind of document you are reading is the first step to understanding what it requires.
How does Congress shape AI policy?
Congress can create AI-related programs, give agencies authority, set duties, fund work, define jurisdiction, or limit executive action by passing a law. A proposed bill does none of those things by itself: it remains a proposal until it completes the legislative process and is enacted.
From bill to law
- A member introduces a bill, which may be referred to one or more committees for consideration.
- The chamber may debate, amend, and vote on the measure. If it passes, the other chamber must also agree to the same text.
- If the chambers pass different versions, they must resolve the differences and approve matching text.
- The bill is presented to the President, who may sign it or veto it. Congress.gov records legislative actions, including committee and floor activity, passage in each chamber, resolution of differences, vetoes, and enacted laws.
When following a proposal, check its latest action and the text that actually passed—not just its title, sponsor, or introduction. Enacted provisions may also have effective dates or direct agencies to take later steps.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchAI policy can come from laws not labeled “AI”
A law need not mention artificial intelligence by name to affect an AI system. Depending on the facts and jurisdiction, existing privacy, consumer-protection, civil-rights, intellectual-property, communications, procurement, and sector-specific laws may apply. The relevant statute and regulator must be checked for any particular use or product; a broad claim that one law governs all AI would be misleading.
Can the President regulate AI by executive order?
An executive order states presidential policy and directs executive departments and agencies to act within their legal authority. It can set priorities, establish coordination processes, and assign deadlines, but it is not an act of Congress and does not automatically create a comprehensive code for private AI businesses. An order can also be amended, revoked, challenged, or constrained by law.
What a recent order does—and does not do
The June 2026 White House order, Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security, assigns federal bodies work on cyber defense and vulnerability coordination and calls for a voluntary framework for government access to covered frontier models before release to trusted partners. The order expressly says that its specified section does not authorize mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting for new AI models. Those are provisions of that order, not a general statement about every federal AI requirement.
Orders can change over time
Executive Order 14110, issued in 2023, is a prior example of presidential AI policymaking. The July 2025 America’s AI Action Plan refers to its rescission. It should not be described as current policy merely because it remains relevant to the history of federal AI policy. For any order, read the text and check for later amendments, rescission, deadlines, and legal limits.
Who regulates AI in the United States?
There is no single federal AI regulator responsible for every AI system. Agencies work within authority Congress has given them and their existing jurisdiction; presidential direction can set executive-branch priorities, while agency implementation may affect particular sectors, government operations, or technical practices. Depending on the matter, implementation can include regulations, enforcement under existing law, standards, technical guidance, grants, research, procurement, and interagency coordination.
NIST develops technical work
The National Institute of Standards and Technology says its AI work responds to congressional mandates, executive orders and policies, other agencies, stakeholder needs, and NIST’s own capabilities. Its work includes areas such as standards, evaluations, cybersecurity, and interpretability. NIST’s technical work is not automatically a binding regulation; determine the status and effect of the particular document or program.
OMB manages federal agency policy
The Office of Management and Budget issues management guidance for the executive branch. Its April 3, 2025 memorandum M-25-21 addresses federal agency AI use, interagency coordination through a Chief AI Officer Council, public trust, and minimum risk-management practices for high-impact agency uses. Its stated scope is federal agencies’ own use and operations, not a general rule for all private AI developers.
OSTP advises and coordinates
The White House describes the Office of Science and Technology Policy as advising the President and Executive Office of the President on scientific, engineering, and technological aspects of national policy and executive-branch work. The OSTP Director chairs the National Science and Technology Council, which coordinates science and technology policymaking across the executive branch.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →How do plans, memoranda, rules, and laws differ?
Document labels matter. A strategy may announce priorities without itself creating legal duties; a proposed rule is not a final rule; and even a final agency rule must rest on delegated authority. Use the document’s issuer, operative language, legal basis, scope, and status to work out what it does.
Best Value
| Instrument | Issuer | Typical role | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Statute | Congress, through enactment | Creates or changes legal duties, programs, authority, or limits. | Enacted text, effective dates, and codification; distinguish it from a bill that has not become law. |
| Executive order | President | Directs executive-branch priorities and agency actions within legal authority. | Order text and cited authority, plus amendments, rescission, deadlines, and legal challenges. |
| Regulation | Agency acting under delegated authority | May establish binding implementing requirements when authorized. | Whether it is proposed or final, its statutory authority, Federal Register publication, effective date, and judicial status. |
| Memorandum or guidance | Executive office or agency | Coordinates management or explains policy and implementation. | Addressees, legal basis, scope, operative language, and later revisions. |
| Strategy or action plan | White House or agency | States priorities and recommends or assigns work. | Whether a separate law, order, memorandum, or rule has implemented a proposed action. |
Plans need implementation to become specific requirements
The White House published America’s AI Action Plan in July 2025. It is an administration policy plan, not a statute. It recommends or assigns policy actions involving bodies including OSTP, OMB, Commerce/NIST, the FCC, and the FTC. To determine whether a particular action changed practice or obligations, find the later document issued by the responsible body and assess that document on its own terms.
OMB’s memorandum index is one way to discover federal management guidance. In the 2026 review, it listed AI-related memoranda M-26-04 and M-26-10 alongside M-25-21 and M-25-22 from April 2025. An index entry alone does not establish a memorandum’s full scope or whether it remains operative; open the memorandum and check for later revisions.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How extensive is the federal AI policy landscape?
The Government Accountability Office reported 94 AI-related requirements that were government-wide or had government-wide implications, and 10 executive-branch oversight or advisory groups involved in federal AI implementation and oversight. GAO’s requirements summary is dated July 2025. These are findings within GAO’s selected scope, not a live October 2026 inventory or a count of every AI law, rule, or policy in the United States.
The figures illustrate why federal AI policy is better understood as a stack of authorities and implementation work than as one rule. Requirements can originate in statutes, executive direction, or agency action, and their reach depends on the document and legal authority involved.
How can you follow a federal AI policy item?
- For a bill: search Congress.gov for the bill text and action history. Confirm whether it was enacted, what text became law, and when provisions take effect.
- For an executive order: use the official White House presidential-actions page to locate the order, then read its authority, assigned tasks, deadlines, and any later changes.
- For a regulation: consult the Federal Register and the issuing agency. Identify whether the document is a proposal or final rule, the authority it cites, its effective date, and any relevant court action.
- For executive-branch management guidance: check OMB’s memorandum index, then open the underlying memo to establish its addressees, scope, requirements, and current status.
- For technical policy work: consult NIST’s AI policy-actions information and the specific standard, evaluation, or technical document at issue.
- For any document: record its issuer, type, date, legal basis, affected parties, operative language, and present status. Do not infer a rule for private businesses from a directive whose scope is federal agency operations.
Federal policy is only part of the picture. State and local governments, courts, and sector-specific regulators may also affect a particular AI system or use. A federal process explainer cannot establish those outcomes without examining the relevant jurisdiction and facts.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
