Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Yes—human neurons can be connected to software in a controlled research system, but they do not run ordinary programs like a CPU. In a biological computer, electronics stimulate living neural cells, record their electrical activity, and feed that activity into a software-controlled feedback loop. Cortical Labs’ CL1 is a commercial research platform built around this approach; its existence does not establish that biological computers outperform conventional computers.
How does a biological computer work?
A biological computer couples living neural cultures to electronic hardware and software. The hardware can deliver electrical stimulation and record the culture’s responses. Software turns those signals into inputs, detects neural activity, and uses the recorded output to update a simulated or connected environment.
- Provide a living culture: Neurons are maintained in a controlled environment with the support needed to keep them alive.
- Connect the culture to electronics: An interface stimulates the neurons and records electrical activity.
- Run a feedback loop: Software sends a pattern of stimulation, measures the response, and can adjust what happens next based on that response.
The exchange is bidirectional: software can send signals to the culture, and the culture’s activity can become an input to the software. This is not a conventional computer containing a miniature human brain; it is a system in which living cells and electronic controls interact.
What is the CL1?
The CL1 is Cortical Labs’ commercial research platform for interfacing cultured neurons with software. The company describes it as a real-time closed-loop system with programmable stimulation and recording, integrated life support, and software interaction (Cortical Labs’ CL1 overview). The company says the platform is designed to sustain neurons for up to six months; that is a vendor design claim, not an independently verified lifespan result in the sources cited here.
#1 Best Overall
- High performance and Low Power: Maix M1 Dock is based on the intelligent computing chip K210 (RISC-V Dual Core 64bit, with FPU，400Mhz-500Mhz, Neural network processor ) for AloT edge computing solution
- EASY to USE ROBOT VISION: It's a development kit to simplify AIOT application programming, so that developers can use simple Micropython syntax to development, easy to apply to machine vision and machine hearing, such as face recognition identification, object recognition, microphone array applications
- Computing power Up to 1 TOPS: Support TensorFlow/Keras/Darknet/Caffe Mainstream framework
- Application: Attendance and access control, automatic driving, smart robots, Internet of Things, passenger flow statistics, smart wear, smart home,predictive maintenance, anomaly detection, machine vision, robotics, voice recognition
Cortical Labs’ developer guide documents Python controls for recordings, stimulation, spike detection, and closed-loop algorithms. It also describes a simulator for people who do not have CL1 hardware (CL1 developer guide). Cortical Cloud is marketed as a way to access CL1 systems remotely and deploy code without owning a device or running a lab (Cortical Cloud). The available information does not establish public access terms or pricing.
How is organoid intelligence different?
Organoid intelligence is a broader research program focused on using three-dimensional human brain-cell cultures, often called brain organoids, with brain-machine interfaces for biological computing. A 2023 roadmap discusses possible work on learning and memory, stimulus-response training, microelectrode interfaces, culture support, and ethics. It describes the field as being in its infancy (2023 organoid-intelligence roadmap).
Do not use “organoid” as a generic name for every neuron-on-chip system. The CL1 is described as using cultured neurons; the roadmap’s organoid-intelligence vision specifically concerns 3D cultures. These approaches overlap in their interest in biological computation, but they are not interchangeable descriptions of the same setup.
Recommended Free Tools
What has been demonstrated—and what remains open?
Institutional announcements show that the work is progressing, but they do not provide proof that biological systems are better general-purpose computers.
Rank #2
- 【Core Parameters】★AI Perf: 34/67 TOPS ★GPU:1024-core Ampere architecture GPU with 32 Tensor Cores ★CPU:6-core Arm Corte-A78AE v8.2 64-bit CPU 1.5MB L2 + 4MB L3 ★Memory:8GB 128-bit LPDDR5 68 GB/s ★Storage: external NVMe via M.2 Key M
- 【Empowered by Large Al Model, Enhanced Human-Computer Interaction】Jetson Orin Super leverages three AI models and incorporates an AI voice interaction module. This multimodal visual system matches the scene being described, enabling environmental awareness and AI visual gameplay. Combined with a large-scale voice module and camera, it enables speech-to-text, semantic analysis, natural conversation, and real-time video analysis, enabling advanced embodied AI applications.
- 【AI Upgrade】Jetson Orin Nano series modules are compact in size but can deliver up to 34-67 TOPS of AI performance, with power consumption ranging from 7 watts to 25 watts. Compared to the Jetson Nano B01, it offers up to 80 times the performance and sets a new standard for entry-level edge AI.
- 【Highly compatible carrier board】Yahboom's carrier board is fully compatible with orin nano module. Compared to carrier boards that use Jetson Nano on the market, the newly upgraded circuit supports 25W power mode, which enables larger and more complex neural networks and fully leverages the performance of the core module. The resources, size, and interfaces of the Yahboom carrier board are consistent with the official board, with the only difference addition of power switch button.
- 【Tutorial materials provided】The JETSON system based on Ubuntu 22.04 provides a complete desktop Linux environment with accelerated graphics, supporting CUDA 12.6, TensorRT 10.7.0, cuDNN 9.6.0, OpenCV 4.10.0, etc. The performance on AI LLM, VLM and visual Transformer is significantly improved compared with the previous generation.
- In January 2026, the University of Milan and its collaborators announced a planned study of learning dynamics, energy efficiency relative to traditional architectures, robustness, reproducibility, and long-term stability. The announcement describes research goals, not completed comparative results. It characterizes the CL1 platform as containing approximately 800,000 neurons; that figure is from the announcement, not an independent count (University of Milan collaboration announcement).
- In August 2026, NUS Medicine announced a biological data-centre prototype with DayOne and Cortical Labs, including a deployed 20-unit CL1 system in a live research environment. “20-unit” describes the deployed system, not its neuron count or the scale of a general market. The announcement frames lower power intensity and possible applications as aims or potential, not as an independently quantified comparison with conventional computing (NUS Medicine announcement).
These projects make biological computing a real research and platform area, not a proven replacement for silicon. A meaningful comparison would need to account for task and output quality, input and training-data needs, the energy used by the whole system—including cell culture and life support—reproducibility, useful operating life, and cost or access. The cited announcements do not settle those comparisons.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Are biological computers more energy efficient than AI?
That has not been established by the cited evidence. Researchers are investigating energy efficiency, and institutional announcements describe lower power use as a potential benefit, but they do not publish an independent, quantified whole-system comparison against conventional computers or AI. A fair comparison would need to include the energy required to maintain the culture as well as the electronics, and measure systems performing comparable tasks.
Are brain cells on a chip conscious?
The cited roadmap does not establish consciousness in cultured-cell systems. It cautions against treating human concepts such as cognition, intelligence, sentience, and consciousness as directly transferable to simple cell cultures. Its authors write: “Obviously, terms such as ‘cognition,’ ‘intelligence,’ ‘sentience,’ and ‘consciousness,’ describing human capabilities, cannot be directly translated to simple cell culture models; they are used here to describe the realization of basic functions underlying these higher-order functionalities.” The roadmap also argues for embedding ethics in the development of organoid-intelligence research.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
