Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more

A 2006 report from Chemistry World described a sulfur-based route to C-glycosides and a one-pot extension that avoids protecting and later restoring the sugar’s hydroxyl groups. The method converts 2-deoxy-D-ribose through an anomeric sulfone, then uses a Ramberg–Bäcklund reaction to form the carbon-linked sugar analogue.

Why make a C-glycoside?

Many naturally occurring carbohydrate units are joined through an O-acetal bond. That oxygen-containing linkage can be susceptible to hydrolysis. In a C-glycoside, carbon takes the place of the linkage oxygen, offering a potentially more robust connection. Conventional routes can require temporary protection of the sugar’s exposed hydroxyl groups, followed by deprotection to restore them—a sequence the reported approach was designed to avoid. Chemistry World’s March 8, 2006 account describes the rationale and the proposed practical advantage.

How the reported route works

  1. Install a sulfur-containing group at the anomeric carbon. The example starts with 2-deoxy-D-ribose, which the report says has three hydroxyl groups. A sulfonyl Wittig reagent selectively reacts at the anomeric carbon, replacing its hydroxyl with a CH2SO2R group and forming an anomeric sulfone.
  2. Use a Ramberg–Bäcklund reaction. The sulfone is treated with base and a halogenating agent. As Chemistry World summarizes the transformation, the sulfone group is replaced by a double-bonded carbon, producing the C-glycoside.
  3. Combine the sequence in one pot. The University of York group led by Richard J. K. Taylor extended the procedure to a one-pot process without protecting the hydroxyl groups. The report presents avoiding protection and deprotection as the key advance.

The reaction outline and one-pot claim above are those in the 2006 news report; it is not a laboratory protocol.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

What the advance does—and does not—establish

Removing hydroxyl-protection steps could simplify preparation of C-glycosides, since protection and deprotection add manipulations to a synthesis. But the news account supplies no yields, quantities, solvents, temperatures, substrate tables, or comparative step-count data. It therefore does not establish how broadly the method works, how efficient it is, or how it compares quantitatively with other routes. Chemistry World cites a paper by R. J. K. Taylor and colleagues in Carbohydrate Research (2006, described as “in press” at the time), but those experimental details are not given in the report.

#1 Best Overall
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

Why the report mentions drugs and biosensors

C-glycosides were presented as possible building blocks for robust analogues of natural carbohydrates and carbohydrate derivatives, with potential relevance to areas such as drugs and biosensors. Those are prospective applications, not evidence that this route produced a particular medicine, commercial biosensor, or clinical product. Chemistry World quoted Paul Murphy of University College Dublin describing the prospect of making biologically relevant C-glycoconjugates without difficult protecting-group manipulations.

Quick Recap

SaleBestseller No. 1
SaleBestseller No. 2
Organic Chemistry (MasteringChemistry)
Organic Chemistry (MasteringChemistry)
Access Code included
$319.99
SaleBestseller No. 4
Rank #2

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.