Recommended Free Tools
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
3Dfx’s later graphics-card history is a story of two strategic turns: Voodoo3 combined 2D and 3D graphics on one board, while Voodoo4 and Voodoo5 used the VSA-100 chip in single- and multi-chip designs. This period brought 3Dfx into direct competition with NVIDIA’s fast-moving TNT2 and GeForce products—and exposed the costs of 3Dfx’s manufacturing and product strategy.
This second volume follows the company from Voodoo3’s 1998 announcement through the Voodoo4 and Voodoo5 generation. It builds on the earlier Voodoo Graphics, Voodoo Rush, and Voodoo2 story covered in Vol. 1.
From Voodoo2 to Voodoo3: 3Dfx changes direction
Earlier Voodoo boards were primarily 3D accelerators: users generally paired them with a separate 2D graphics adapter. Voodoo3 changed that arrangement by putting 2D and 3D functionality on one card. Its design retained the dual-texture-unit approach associated with Voodoo2, while making a Voodoo card a more complete replacement for a conventional graphics adapter.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →3Dfx announced Voodoo3 at COMDEX on November 16, 1998, according to the collector-authored history. The change coincided with a major shift in how the company planned to sell graphics products. On December 14, 1998, 3Dfx announced its acquisition of STB Systems, a board maker. Rather than primarily supplying chips to a broad set of board partners, 3Dfx increasingly aimed to design and sell complete cards itself.
#1 Best Overall
- Memory Speed:19 Gbps.Digital Max Resolution: 3840 x 2160
- NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 GPU. 384 processor cores. 4GB DDR3. 64-bit memory bus. Engine clock: 902 MHz. Memory clock: 1600 MHz. PCI Express 2.0 (x8 lanes)
- Package contents : ZOTAC GeForce GT 730. 1 x Low-profile bracket [VGA]. 1 x Low-profile bracket [DVI + HDMI]. User manual.Driver disc
- 1 x DL-DVI-D. 1 x VGA. 1 x HDMI. Triple simultaneous display capable. HDCP compliant.
- 300-watt power supply recomillimeterended. 25-watt max power consumption
That strategy offered greater control over board design, branding, and sales, but risked narrowing the ecosystem of companies making 3Dfx-based products. The historical account links the shift to former partners moving toward competing chips; that is a plausible strategic interpretation, not proof that the acquisition alone caused those companies’ decisions.
Voodoo3 models, boards, and launch dates
The main Voodoo3 retail families were the 2000, 3000, and 3500, with the 3500TV adding a more extensive television and video package. Cards appeared in PCI and AGP forms, and OEM and regional boards did not always share the same memory, clock, cooling, or output configuration. A model name alone is not enough to identify every board’s specifications.
| Family | What the historical account reports | Important qualification |
|---|---|---|
| Voodoo3 2000 | PCI and AGP boards; 8 MB and 16 MB variants; clock figures of 125 MHz in early announcement material and 143 MHz in later retail descriptions. | The conflicting figures should not be collapsed into one universal clock specification. |
| Voodoo3 3000 | Generally described with 16 MB and a higher clock than the 2000; the account cites 183 MHz in early announcement material and 166 MHz in later retail descriptions. Some versions have TV or S-Video output. | Clock and output details are board- and source-dependent. |
| Voodoo3 3500 / 3500TV | The account cites a 183 MHz figure for the 3500. The 3500TV adds tuner and A/V features, including an external A/V Control Pod. | NTSC/PAL tuner assignments and exact retail specifications are reported by the collector source, not independently established here. |
The chronology also needs careful wording because an announcement, a stated release date, and actual shipment are different events. The account says Voodoo3 2000 and 3000 were formally announced or released for retail on February 12, 1999, gives April 7 as a release date, and lists prices of $129.99 and $179.99. It dates the Voodoo3 3500TV to July 30, 1999, at a listed $249. These dates and prices are source-reported rather than confirmed here against surviving corporate price lists or shipment records.
OEM and third-party branches
Voodoo3 cards were not limited to 3Dfx-branded retail boards. The collector account and collection catalog document OEM or partner-related examples associated with Gateway, Compaq, Dell, ASUS, PowerColor, and VillageTronic. These boards show that 3Dfx products continued to circulate through varied systems and markets even as the company moved toward its own manufacturing model. Their exact configurations must be established board by board rather than inferred from the chip or family name.
3500TV and the multimedia push
The 3500TV is notable because it went beyond adding a display output: its package centered on television tuning and video input/output, with an external A/V Control Pod. The historical account identifies Philips tuner hardware on NTSC versions and Samsung hardware on PAL versions; treat that assignment as reported rather than universal without a board-level check. Later VoodooTV 100 PCI, VoodooTV 200, and VoodooTV-FM products likewise indicate 3Dfx’s attempt to extend its consumer footprint into multimedia, not just game acceleration.
Velocity 100, Voodoo3 1000, and cut-down designs
In July 1999, 3Dfx announced the Velocity branding for lower-cost products. The Velocity 100 and the Voodoo3 1000 examples discussed in the historical account illustrate how a Voodoo3-derived design could be simplified for particular price points or OEM systems.
The source describes some such boards as having 8 MB of SGRAM, an approximately 143 MHz clock, and one texture-management unit rather than two. Those details do not apply automatically to every similarly named board. The account also distinguishes engineering samples, qualification samples, and retail BIOS versions. For collectors, BIOS revision, PCB date, labels, and factory markings can help reconstruct development, but none of those clues alone proves a board’s commercial status or provenance.
Reading 3Dfx boards as historical evidence
One of the most useful aspects of the surviving Voodoo3–Voodoo5 material is its board-level detail. PCB part numbers, manufacturing-week codes, BIOS versions, connector layouts, component placement, heatsinks, and AGP-slot-hook revisions can distinguish design iterations that product names conceal.
The collector history cites Voodoo3 PCB families 210-0364, 210-0366, 210-0369, 210-0371, and 210-0380; Voodoo4 evaluation-board families 210-0386 and 210-0389; Voodoo5 5500 AGP family 210-0413; and Voodoo5 5500 PCI family 210-0414. These identifiers are useful only when the actual markings are visible and legible, such as in the collection catalog.
Labels such as “NOT FOR RESALE,” “TEST,” and “QC” may indicate a sample or internal handling, but they are not interchangeable classifications. An engineering sample can document a proposed design; it does not establish mass production, retail availability, or final specifications. Likewise, a date code or BIOS image is strongest when supported by clear photographs and a credible chain of provenance.
Rank #3
- Memorable Keepsake: Give a beautifully crafted gift card that lasts beyond the occasion.
- High-Quality: Printed on premium, heavy duty, square card stock paper for smudge free writing.
- Ample Writing Space: plenty of room in the blank interior for heartfelt wishes.
- Included Envelope: Complimentary white envelope ensures your message is ready to be delivered.
- Made in USA; Card 5.5 x 5.5”, Envelope 6 x 6”
Competition and the limits of Voodoo3
NVIDIA announced TNT2 on March 15, 1999, according to the historical account. It characterizes Voodoo3 as broadly competitive with TNT2 and says TNT2 Ultra could outperform the Voodoo3 3500. Without a cited benchmark specifying game, API, resolution, color depth, drivers, and test system, that comparison should be read as an attributed period-level assessment—not a universal ranking.
The larger competitive issue was pace. Voodoo3 had strong continuity with 3Dfx’s established Glide ecosystem and offered an integrated, straightforward board design, but its feature set was aging as competitors advanced. The source particularly contrasts its emphasis on 16-bit rendering with newer competitors’ stronger 32-bit capabilities. As NVIDIA refreshed products quickly, 3Dfx’s longer development cycles made each delay more consequential.
VSA-100: the Voodoo4 and Voodoo5 foundation
VSA-100 powered the Voodoo4 and Voodoo5 generation. The collector history describes it as an evolution of Voodoo3 rather than a complete architectural break, and attributes 32-bit color, AGP texturing, a 24-bit Z-buffer, and support for connecting multiple chips through scan-line interleaving to it. It also reports a 250 nm process and nominal 166 MHz core and memory clocks in its Voodoo4 specification table. Those technical details should be checked against period documentation before treating them as a complete specification.
The product strategy was easier to understand than to execute: use one VSA-100 chip for a lower-tier card, and combine chips to scale performance for higher tiers. More chips meant greater complexity in board layout, power delivery, cooling, and driver support.
| Product | Intended configuration | Status and caveat |
|---|---|---|
| Voodoo4 4500 AGP / PCI | One VSA-100 chip | Both interfaces were announced; details vary by board. |
| Voodoo5 5000 PCI | Multi-chip VSA-100 design | Announced product; broad retail availability is not established by the cited account. |
| Voodoo5 5500 AGP | Two VSA-100 chips | Retail product, with PCI and Mac PCI variants also discussed. |
| Voodoo5 6000 AGP | Four VSA-100 chips in the intended flagship configuration | Primarily an engineering-sample and collector object, not an ordinary retail card; the account lists 128 MB. |
3Dfx announced the family at COMDEX ’99 on November 15, 1999, and the account reports public demonstrations of Voodoo4/Voodoo5 boards at CeBIT in February 2000 and the Voodoo5 6000 at WinHEC on April 26, 2000. Demonstration hardware and announced configurations should not be mistaken for finished retail products.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesRank #4
- ATI 109-49800-11
- P/N 1024980311
Why Voodoo5 arrived before Voodoo4
The cited account dates the Voodoo4 4500 release to October 13, 2000, around four months after the Voodoo5 5500. It interprets that order as a consequence of prioritizing the higher-performance multi-chip design: 3Dfx needed the two-chip Voodoo5 to compete with GeForce2 GTS-class products while its product cycle was already slowing.
That is a useful explanation of the product sequence, but it is an interpretation rather than a quoted corporate rationale. What is clear from the sequence is that Voodoo4 reached the market after the flagship family it might otherwise have introduced, weakening the impression of a fresh product ladder.
Voodoo5 5500 launch reports and reliability claims
Dates in the collector account conflict: it gives June 22, 2000 as a Voodoo5 5500 shipment date, while also citing a report that cards began shipping May 5, were recalled May 25 over possible power-supply problems, and shipped again June 9. The recall narrative is therefore best described as a collector-reported account, not a settled company-wide event on the evidence cited here.
The same history mentions instability experienced with a card obtained on the secondary market. That single experience cannot establish a general defect in all Voodoo5 5500 boards. A card decades old may have failed or aging components, prior repairs or modifications, a marginal power supply, or other condition-specific problems. The account’s report of low yields is likewise not quantified by independently established production data.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteMacintosh versions and compatibility
3Dfx announced Mac versions of the Voodoo4 4500 PCI and Voodoo5 5500 PCI in April 2000, and the historical account dates availability of the Mac Voodoo5 5500 PCI to August 10, 2000. A continuation of the discussion on VOGONS also covers Mac-product details.
Best Value
- Show off your old GPU with pride!
- Minimal desgin and small footprint
- Rubber feet for stability
- Handmade - All Items are 3D printed and designed by Custom3DLights
A PCI connector does not guarantee that a PC card will work in a Mac. Firmware or ROM, drivers, display initialization, connector configuration, and operating-system support all matter. Mac-specific cards should be identified and evaluated as platform-specific products, rather than assumed interchangeable with PC PCI versions.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Why this generation mattered—and why it struggled
Voodoo3 represented 3Dfx’s move from a specialist 3D accelerator to an integrated graphics-card product. VSA-100 then offered a way to scale performance through multiple chips and a more ambitious anti-aliasing proposition. But the strategy carried costs: multi-chip boards were larger and more demanding, relied on driver behavior for scaling, and took time to bring to market.
At the same time, 3Dfx’s move toward manufacturing its own boards traded partner breadth for greater direct control. The available collector account does not, by itself, establish how much this affected sales or particular partners, but it identifies the central strategic tension. NVIDIA’s rapid product cadence made timing increasingly important, while 3Dfx was managing manufacturing complexity and software support across a changing product range.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →This history should not be read as an inevitable march toward failure: each choice had a commercial logic when made. In retrospect, the combination of delayed product cycles, increasingly complex boards, and competitive pressure left less room for error. The cited material does not provide sufficient corporate documentation to quantify each factor’s contribution to 3Dfx’s eventual collapse or the subsequent transfer of key assets to NVIDIA.
Timeline: announcements and reported availability
| Date | Milestone | How to read it |
|---|---|---|
| November 16, 1998 | Voodoo3 announced at COMDEX ’98. | Announcement date reported by the collector history. |
| December 14, 1998 | 3Dfx announced the STB Systems acquisition. | Corporate announcement date reported by the source. |
| February 12, 1999 | Voodoo3 2000 and 3000 described as formally released or announced for retail. | The source’s wording does not fully distinguish announcement from shipment. |
| April 7, 1999 | Voodoo3 2000 and 3000 release date given; listed prices were $129.99 and $179.99. | Source-reported date and listed prices; not independently confirmed here. |
| July 30, 1999 | Voodoo3 3500TV release date given, at a listed $249. | Source-reported date and price. |
| November 15, 1999 | Voodoo4/Voodoo5 family announced at COMDEX ’99. | Announcement, not general retail availability. |
| February 2000 | Voodoo4/Voodoo5 boards demonstrated at CeBIT. | Public demonstration reported by the source. |
| April 26, 2000 | Voodoo5 6000 demonstrated at WinHEC. | Demonstration hardware; not a retail launch. |
| October 13, 2000 | Voodoo4 4500 release date given. | Source-reported release date. |
How to assess a surviving board
- Identify the exact board. Record the model label, interface, memory chips, outputs, PCB number, and visible revision marks; do not infer a full configuration from the GPU name alone.
- Separate status from appearance. “TEST,” “QC,” and “NOT FOR RESALE” markings can be informative, but an engineering sample, qualification sample, and retail board are different categories.
- Preserve evidence. Photograph both sides, labels, date codes, connectors, and BIOS information before cleaning or modifying a specimen. Connect physical markings to a documented provenance where possible.
- Treat operation as a separate question. A card’s historical importance does not indicate that it is safe or reliable to power today. Age, prior repair, replacement components, and system power conditions can affect operation.
The extended collection catalog is especially useful for seeing the range of board-level variants, while the VOGONS discussion preserves a continuation of the article and reader commentary. Together with the original forum history, they are valuable collector-oriented references; their photographs and observations are strongest when treated as evidence about the specimens shown, rather than as definitive proof of every company-wide specification or event.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
