Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Google Tensor is the mobile processor family built for Pixel phones, not Google Cloud’s Tensor Processing Unit. Google’s current Pixel comparison pairs Tensor G6 with the Pixel 11 family and Tensor G5 with Pixel 10. In the cited review tests, Pixel 11 Pro models scored higher on CPU benchmarks than their Pixel 10 Pro counterparts, but slightly lower on a graphics test—so the results do not support a simple claim that Tensor G6 is faster at everything.
Which Pixel phones use Tensor G5 and G6?
Google’s Pixel comparison lists Tensor G6 for Pixel 11 models and Tensor G5 for Pixel 10. Google describes Tensor as its custom-designed mobile processor; it is generally encountered as part of a Pixel phone rather than sold as a separate consumer chip. That device context matters: memory, cooling, software and power settings can affect results even when two phones use the same Tensor generation. Google’s comparison identifies chip pairings but does not provide a complete engineering specification table for every generation.
Earlier generations appeared in previous Pixel products: Tensor G1 debuted with Pixel 6, G2 with Pixel 7-generation devices and Pixel Tablet, G3 with Pixel 8 and Pixel 8 Pro, and G4 with Pixel 9 devices. Google announced G3 for Pixel 8 and Pixel 8 Pro and notes that the Tensor security core works with the Titan M2 security chip in its Tensor G3 announcement.
Recommended Free Tools
Google Tensor specs: what is officially established?
Tensor G5
Google says Tensor G5 is manufactured using a TSMC 3 nm process. In its Tensor G5 announcement, Google claims up to 60% more powerful TPU performance and an average CPU that is 34% faster than the previous generation. Those are Google’s comparisons, not independent benchmark scores; they should be read as manufacturer claims rather than a guarantee for every task or phone.
#1 Best Overall
- Google Pixel 10a is a durable, everyday phone with more[1]; snap brilliant photography on a simple, powerful camera, get 30+ hours out of a full charge[2], and do more with helpful AI like Gemini[3]
- Unlocked Android phone gives you the flexibility to change carriers and choose your own data plan; it works with Google Fi, Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, and other major carriers
- Pixel 10a is sleek and durable, with a super smooth finish, scratch-resistant Corning Gorilla Glass 7i display, and IP68 water and dust protection[4]
- The Actua display with 3,000-nit peak brightness shows up clear as day, even in direct sunlight[5]
- Plan, create, and get more done with help from Gemini, your built-in AI assistant[3]; have it screen spam calls while you focus[6]; chat with Gemini to brainstorm your meal plan[7], or bring your ideas to life with Nano Banana[8]
Google also says Gemini Nano runs 2.6 times faster and 2 times more efficiently for selected Pixel Screenshots and Recorder use cases. These figures refer to those stated features and workloads, not a general measure of all on-device AI performance. Google characterizes Tensor this way: “At the core of this is Tensor, Google’s custom-designed mobile processor.”
Tensor G1 as a published technical reference
For G1, Notebookcheck lists a 5 nm system-on-chip with two Cortex-X1 cores up to 2.8 GHz, two Cortex-A76 cores up to 2.25 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores up to 1.8 GHz, plus Mali-G78 MP20 graphics and Titan M2 security hardware. These are secondary-source specifications, not a Google-published specification sheet. Notebookcheck’s Google Tensor technical reference does not establish equivalent full specifications for every newer generation.
Rank #2
- Google Pixel 10 Pro is the ultimate Pixel experience, featuring advanced AI with Gemini, unbelievable camera quality, impeccable design in two sizes, and the next-gen Google Tensor G5 chip[1]
- Unlocked Android phone gives you the flexibility to change carriers and choose your own data plan[2]; it works - Google Fi, Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, and other major carriers
- Get a head start on syncing your data before it even arrives: After you purchase your new Pixel, look for an email that explains how to transfer your photos, videos, passwords, and more in just a few quick steps[11]
- Pixel’s pro camera system makes everything look amazing, even in low light; capture more of the scene with advanced Google AI models, and bring out incredible details with 100x Pro Res Zoom, stunning 50 MP images, and super steady videos in 8K[10]
- Pixel 10 Pro is built with durable aluminum and Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for scratch and drop resistance; the 6.3-inch Super Actua display with 3,300-nit peak brightness is easy on the eyes, even in direct sunlight[3,13,18]
Tensor G5 vs G6: what do the benchmarks show?
There is no single directly comparable score set covering every Tensor phone. The figures below come from different sources and methods, so treat each group as its own comparison rather than combining them into a single ranking.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsReview scores: Pixel 11 Pro versus Pixel 10 Pro
Tom’s Guide reports these results in its Geekbench 6 and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited tests. The results show higher Geekbench CPU scores for the tested Pixel 11 Pro models, while the cited graphics scores are slightly lower than the matching Pixel 10 Pro models.
Rank #3
- 6.2" OLED 428PPI, 1080x2400px, 120Hz, HDR10+, Bluetooth 5.3, 4575mAh Battery, Android 14
- 128GB 8GB RAM, Octa-core, Google Tensor G3 (4nm), Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510), Mali-G710 MP7
- Rear Camera: 50MP, f/1.7 (wide) + 12MP, f/2.2 (ultrawide), Front Camera: 10.5MP, f/2.2
- 2G: GSM 850/900/1800/1900, CDMA 800/1700/1900, 3G: HSDPA 800/850/900/1700(AWS)/1900/2100, CDMA2000 1xEV-DO, 4G LTE: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/14/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/29/30/38/40/41/46/48/66/71, 5G: 1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/25/26/28/29/30/38/40/41/48/66/70/71/77/78/258/260/261 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Nano-SIM and eSIM
- Compatible with Most GSM + CDMA Carriers like T-Mobile, AT&T, MetroPCS, etc. Will Also work with CDMA Carriers Such as Verizon, Sprint.
| Phone tested | Geekbench 6 single-core / multi-core | 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited points / fps |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel 11 Pro | 2,649 / 7,164 | 3,113 / 18.65 |
| Pixel 10 Pro | 2,335 / 6,375 | 3,134 / 18.77 |
| Pixel 11 Pro XL | 2,713 / 7,453 | 3,249 / 19.46 |
| Pixel 10 Pro XL | 2,322 / 6,286 | 3,462 / 20.73 |
These are reviewer test results, not a claim that all Pixel 11 devices will behave the same way in every workload. In particular, the graphics results do not show an across-the-board improvement over the corresponding Pixel 10 Pro models. See Tom’s Guide’s Pixel 11 benchmark results for its review figures.
Other published Geekbench figures
- Pixel 10 with Tensor G5: Geekbench Browser’s user-submitted Geekbench 6 chart reports 1,905 single-core and 5,400 multi-core. These are chart figures from a changing submission pool, not a controlled lab test. View the Pixel 10 Geekbench chart.
- Pixel 11 Pro XL with Tensor G6: Notebookcheck lists one Geekbench 6.7.1 single-core result of 2,687. It is one sample, not an average or a stable estimate of the device’s performance distribution. View Notebookcheck’s Pixel 11 Pro XL results.
Because these figures differ in source, sample basis and test version, they should not be treated as a controlled head-to-head comparison. Tom’s Guide’s paired review tests are the clearest direct comparison in this set; the other figures provide separate snapshots.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How to interpret Tensor benchmarks
A benchmark describes a specific device running a specific test; it is not a universal measure of “Tensor speed.” Use comparisons that match on the details that affect the result:
- Test and version: Compare Geekbench 6 with Geekbench 6, and compare graphics scores only when the same 3DMark workload is used.
- Phone configuration: The exact model, memory, cooling, software build and power settings can change performance.
- Sample basis: A single submitted result is not equivalent to a multi-submission chart figure or a reviewer’s set of phone tests.
- Workload type: CPU results do not establish GPU or AI performance. Nor do short synthetic runs establish sustained performance.
- Use over time: These benchmark figures do not by themselves establish battery life, thermal behavior during long sessions, or everyday responsiveness.
Is Google Tensor good for gaming?
The available graphics comparison is more useful for this question than CPU scores alone: Tom’s Guide’s Pixel 11 Pro and Pro XL results are slightly below their Pixel 10 Pro counterparts in the cited 3DMark test. That single synthetic graphics workload cannot establish how every game performs, whether frame rates stay consistent in a long session, or how much battery a game uses. The cited evidence therefore supports a limited conclusion about those tested devices and benchmark, not a broad verdict about Tensor gaming performance.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
