Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
To assess Fortescue’s share-price valuation, look beyond a single earnings multiple: compare the market value of its shares with sustainable earnings and cash flow, then test those figures against iron-ore prices, shipments, costs, capital spending and debt. Fortescue reported record shipments and strong FY26 results, but those historical results alone do not show whether the shares are cheap today. A live market price and matching financial data are needed to calculate a current valuation.
What Fortescue’s latest reported results show
Fortescue’s FY26 results, released on 20 August 2026, reported 201.3 million tonnes (Mt) of iron-ore shipments, US$8.6 billion of underlying EBITDA, US$3.5 billion of underlying net profit after tax (NPAT), US$3.2 billion of free cash flow and dividends of A$1.08 per share. These are figures for the financial year, not forecasts, current valuation multiples or a price target. See the FY26 results materials.
The reported figures need market context before they can answer whether the shares are attractively valued. A share price or market capitalisation must be matched to earnings or cash flow from a clearly identified period; for enterprise-value comparisons, net debt and other relevant adjustments also matter. The figures above do not, by themselves, provide those inputs.
Recommended Free Tools
Which valuation metrics are useful for Fortescue?
Price-to-earnings ratio
The price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is the share price divided by earnings per share (EPS). Alternatively, equity market value divided by attributable net profit gives an equivalent company-level measure when the inputs use consistent share and earnings definitions. P/E is easy to communicate, but iron-ore prices and production can move earnings sharply. A single-year ratio can therefore look unusually high or low; compare multiple periods and state any assumptions used to estimate normalised earnings.
#1 Best Overall
Enterprise value to EBITDA
Enterprise value (EV) generally starts with equity value plus net debt, with other adjustments where relevant. Dividing EV by EBITDA helps compare operating businesses with different financing structures. However, EBITDA is not cash available to shareholders: capital expenditure, taxes, working capital and rehabilitation obligations all affect what remains.
Free-cash-flow yield
Free-cash-flow yield is free cash flow divided by equity market value. State how free cash flow is defined, including whether it is before or after growth investment, and keep the numerator and market-value date consistent. Fortescue reported US$3.2 billion of FY26 free cash flow, but without the matching market value and a consistent cash-flow definition, that figure is not enough to calculate a yield.
Dividend yield and payout
Dividend yield compares declared distributions with the share price. The payout ratio compares distributions with a stated earnings measure. Both can help income-focused investors, but neither should be treated as a promise: assess whether payments are supported by recurring cash generation and consider investment needs and balance-sheet capacity.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Why operating performance matters to the multiples
For an iron-ore producer, shipments, realised prices, product mix and unit costs help explain the earnings and cash flow behind valuation ratios. Fortescue’s FY25 annual report recorded a hematite realised price of US$85 per dry metric tonne (dmt) and a hematite C1 cost of US$17.99 per wet metric tonne (wmt). It also reported underlying EBITDA of US$7.941 billion and attributable NPAT of US$3.373 billion for FY25. These are FY25 figures, not the latest year’s results. See the FY25 Annual Report.
The FY25 comparison illustrates why a miner’s earnings multiple needs operating context. Fortescue reported FY25 revenue of US$15.541 billion, underlying EBITDA of US$7.941 billion, attributable NPAT of US$3.373 billion and EPS of 110 US cents. Its FY24 comparison figures were revenue of US$18.220 billion, EBITDA of US$10.708 billion, attributable NPAT of US$5.683 billion and EPS of 185 US cents. Hematite realised price fell from US$103/dmt in FY24 to US$85/dmt in FY25, while hematite C1 cost edged down from US$18.24/wmt to US$17.99/wmt. In other words, cost control can coexist with lower earnings when realised prices fall.
Shipments also need a period label. Fortescue’s FY25 results announcement reported record shipments of 198.4 Mt, while the FY26 summary reported 201.3 Mt. The FY25 announcement also reported total declared dividends of A$1.10 per share, equal to a 65% payout of NPAT; the FY26 summary reported A$1.08 per share. Keep each year, currency and metric definition attached to its figure rather than combining values from different reporting periods. See the FY25 results announcement.
Debt and capital spending belong in the valuation
Net debt affects enterprise value and a miner’s ability to withstand a downturn. Liquidity and planned capital expenditure also matter: investment can reduce near-term cash available for dividends while supporting future production or other projects. For a current assessment, consult Fortescue’s full FY26 statements for balance-sheet details and use a consistent definition of net debt; the headline results summary alone does not establish precise current debt metrics.
How to make a like-for-like comparison
- Use miners with similar commodity exposure, product quality, cost definitions, asset maturity and operating jurisdictions. A diversified miner is not automatically a close peer for a company primarily exposed to iron ore.
- Match reporting periods and currencies. Do not compare one company’s current-year earnings with another’s older results without making the timing clear.
- Check whether earnings, cash flow and cost measures are statutory, underlying or otherwise adjusted, and use consistent definitions across companies.
- Separate observed results from assumptions about future iron-ore prices, production, costs and investment. A valuation based on forecast or normalised earnings depends on those assumptions.
No timestamped share price, peer valuation set or current share count is available in the figures cited here, so they do not support a current P/E, EV/EBITDA, free-cash-flow yield, fair value or share-price target. Fortescue’s investor centre lists its reporting documents and describes its share-price widget as third-party and delayed; a valuation calculation should use market data with a stated timestamp alongside the relevant financial statements. See the Fortescue Investor Centre.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
