iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Former University of Michigan football assistant coach Matt Weiss was indicted on 24 federal counts in a case alleging he accessed athletes’ private accounts and obtained intimate photos and videos. The indictment is a set of charges, not a finding of guilt. As of the U.S. Department of Justice’s latest located update, dated August 25, 2026, the government had appealed an evidence-suppression ruling, pausing trial-court proceedings and cancelling the September 2026 trial setting.
What Weiss is accused of
On March 20, 2025, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan announced a 24-count indictment against Matthew Weiss, described in the announcement as a 42-year-old Ann Arbor resident and former University of Michigan football quarterbacks coach and co-offensive coordinator. The indictment includes 14 counts of unauthorized access to computers and 10 counts of aggravated identity theft. The government alleges the conduct took place from approximately 2015 through January 2023. DOJ’s charging announcement says the government must prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt; an indictment is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt.
Alleged access to databases and personal accounts
According to the indictment as summarized by prosecutors, Weiss allegedly accessed student-athlete databases at more than 100 colleges and universities. The databases were maintained by a third-party vendor and allegedly contained personally identifiable information and medical data concerning more than 150,000 athletes. Prosecutors say he used information from those databases, along with internet research, to gain access to social media, email and/or cloud-storage accounts.
The DOJ announcement distinguishes more than 2,000 target athletes from more than 1,300 additional students and/or alumni whose accounts were allegedly accessed. These figures describe allegations in the government’s case, not findings that Weiss committed the charged offenses.
#1 Best Overall
Alleged intimate material
Prosecutors allege that intimate digital photographs and videos were downloaded from accounts, and describe the material as never intended to be shared beyond intimate partners. DOJ’s case overview separately says thousands of candid, intimate photographs and videos were seized from Weiss’s electronic devices and cloud-storage accounts. Both are government descriptions in a pending case; they do not establish guilt. The material is private, and there is no need to seek out or share it to understand the charges.
Latest reported status of the federal case
The latest official update located is the DOJ case page, updated August 25, 2026. It says the government filed a notice of appeal concerning the trial court’s July 1, 2026 decision suppressing certain evidence. According to DOJ, the appeal suspends proceedings in the trial court. The previously scheduled September 1 status hearing and September 22 trial were cancelled. The page does not provide an appeal outcome or a replacement trial date. Check the DOJ case page for later scheduling or appeal updates.
Case timeline
| Date | Procedural event reported by DOJ |
|---|---|
| March 20, 2025 | The Eastern District of Michigan announced the 24-count indictment. DOJ announcement |
| March 24, 2025 | Weiss stood mute at arraignment, and the judge entered a not-guilty plea; DOJ’s case page also lists bond conditions. DOJ case page |
| January 5, 2026 | A judge denied a motion to dismiss, according to the case page. DOJ case page |
| July 1, 2026 | The trial court issued a decision suppressing certain evidence, as described in the later DOJ update. DOJ case page |
| August 25, 2026 | DOJ reported the government’s notice of appeal, suspension of trial-court proceedings and cancellation of the September hearing and trial settings. No appeal result or replacement date was listed. DOJ case page |
What is established—and what remains alleged
The indictment, the arraignment entry, the motion-to-dismiss ruling and the appeal notice are procedural events recorded by DOJ. The underlying claims about access to databases, accounts and intimate material remain allegations unless and until proved in court. A suppression decision concerns whether certain evidence may be used; the DOJ update does not describe the ruling’s full reasoning or determine the ultimate outcome of the case.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →The charging announcement identifies Weiss as a former Michigan assistant coach. Although the supplied headline calls him a former NFL coach, the official pages cited here do not establish a detailed NFL employment timeline, so that descriptor is not expanded here. The DOJ announcement also says the FBI Detroit Cyber Task Force worked closely with the University of Michigan Police Department; that statement describes the investigation and is not a finding of institutional responsibility.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.If you received a DOJ victim notice
DOJ’s case page advises recipients of its victim notice to contact credit bureau reporting companies because of possible identity theft. Follow the directions in the official notice and use the DOJ case page for current case-specific information. Do not assume that every person whose information appears in the allegations received a notice.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
