Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more

No. According to April 2023 reporting, University of Victoria academic Matt Huculak asked ChatGPT to generate an example of an excellent reference letter, then wrote the submitted letter himself. Huculak said the student later received a University of Cambridge scholarship, but the reports do not prove that the letter caused the award.

What Huculak reportedly did

Huculak, identified in coverage as the University of Victoria’s head of advanced research services, described using ChatGPT as a drafting foil rather than as the final author. He prompted the system for an “excellent” recommendation-letter example and used the result to challenge the formulaic language common in academic references.

He then wrote his own letter. The detailed account reported by Futurism, attributing the comments to Huculak’s interview with The Atlantic, says the generated text served as a template or contrast for a more personal letter. Huculak characterized the result as unusually “human” and heartfelt.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

The letter was not presented as ChatGPT’s final work

The available reports do not say that Huculak submitted ChatGPT’s generated text, nor that the system directly wrote the recommendation sent to Cambridge. The distinction matters: the reported process was AI-assisted idea generation followed by human writing and judgment.

What happened with the Cambridge scholarship

Huculak said the student subsequently received a Cambridge scholarship. That is a reported sequence of events, not a measured finding that the recommendation letter secured the award.

  • The reports do not name the student.
  • They do not identify the scholarship or its monetary value.
  • They do not provide the selection criteria or competing applications.
  • No Cambridge committee member is quoted attributing the decision to Huculak’s letter.

Because those details are unavailable, the anecdote cannot establish causation. A scholarship decision may reflect academic results, research experience, references, interviews, funding limits and other factors that the coverage does not document.

Why Huculak used an AI example

Huculak’s stated goal was to avoid stock recommendation-letter conventions. Futurism quoted him saying that many professors keep collections of letters sorted into categories, an observation he used to illustrate how easily references can become standardized.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

India Today quoted Huculak describing his letter as among the best he had read, noting that it was concise, used concrete examples and addressed the candidate’s ability to collaborate. Those are Huculak’s assessments, not an independent evaluation by Cambridge.

What this episode does—and does not—show about ChatGPT

It shows a possible brainstorming use

A generated example can expose clichés, suggest an organizational structure or give a writer something to critique. In Huculak’s account, that outside model helped him reconsider how he presented specific evidence about the candidate.

It does not show that AI earned the scholarship

This is one person’s account from April 2023, not a study of recommendation letters or scholarship outcomes. It supplies no success rate, controlled comparison or committee testimony. The reports also should not be read as evidence of current ChatGPT capabilities or of any current University of Cambridge or University of Victoria policy.

How to interpret the headline

The headline-style claim that a “ChatGPT letter of recommendation” got someone a Cambridge scholarship is therefore misleading if it suggests the chatbot wrote and submitted the winning letter. A more accurate description is: Huculak used ChatGPT to produce an example, wrote his own recommendation, and later reported that the student won a Cambridge scholarship.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

The Bottom Line

ChatGPT reportedly supplied an example that Matt Huculak used while writing a recommendation letter himself. He said the student later received a Cambridge scholarship, but the available reporting does not establish that the letter—or ChatGPT—caused the result.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.