Wherefour vs Haloglide

Wherefour8.3Visit Haloglide7.9Visit

Higher score Wherefour #1 in Food Traceability Software 8.3/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Wherefour

vs

Haloglide #8 in Food Traceability Software 7.9/10 Paid ✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Haloglide

• Wherefour fits best

  Small food manufacturers managing production and lots

• Haloglide fits best

  Teams needing serialized IDs and targeted recalls

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Wherefour 8.3/10 Visit ↗	Haloglide 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.3	7.9
Ranking	#1 in Food Traceability Software	#8 in Food Traceability Software
Best for	Small food manufacturers managing production and lots	Teams needing serialized IDs and targeted recalls
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	Pricing on request	$399/mo
Free plan	Not checked yet	—
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud
Platforms	Web	Web
Support	Phone, Docs	Email
Integrations	4,989+ integrations	4 integrations
Built for	Small business, Mid-market	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Wherefour 1/3 · Haloglide 1/3
Lot tracking	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Recall management	Not checked yet	✓ (best)
Barcode support	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Specs
Traceability scope	Not checked yet	End_to_end
Food standards	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Listed integrations	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Tracks lots from raw materials through finished goods with recall reports Connects recipes, work orders, yields, and inventory in one ERP Offers integrations including QuickBooks, Shopify, and Xero	Tracks product, lot, unit and supply-chain event identities Supports QR, NFC, RFID and GS1 Digital Links Recall impact analysis supports targeted withdrawals
Cons	Custom quotes make costs harder to compare upfront Its scope extends beyond food traceability into broader manufacturing ERP A cloud deployment may not suit teams seeking another deployment model	Orbit starts at $399 USD per month The platform is cloud-based and web-only Support is available by email
Our verdict	Wherefour is a cloud-based manufacturing ERP for food and other product manufacturers, with tools for production, inventory, and lot traceability. Small food manufacturers managing production and lots can use it to link recipes and work… Read the review →	Haloglide is a cloud-based traceability and transparency platform for growers, processors, exporters, manufacturers, certifiers and other regulated supply-chain teams. It records product, lot, unit and event data, then shares evidence with… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Wherefour — where it wins

  • Tracks lots from raw materials through finished goods with recall reports
  • Connects recipes, work orders, yields, and inventory in one ERP
  • Offers integrations including QuickBooks, Shopify, and Xero

  Where it doesn't

  • Custom quotes make costs harder to compare upfront
  • Its scope extends beyond food traceability into broader manufacturing ERP
  • A cloud deployment may not suit teams seeking another deployment model

• Haloglide — where it wins

  • Tracks product, lot, unit and supply-chain event identities
  • Supports QR, NFC, RFID and GS1 Digital Links
  • Recall impact analysis supports targeted withdrawals

  Where it doesn't

  • Orbit starts at $399 USD per month
  • The platform is cloud-based and web-only
  • Support is available by email

• Wherefour8.3/10 · Pricing on request

  Wherefour combines batch operations and bidirectional traceability for growing food manufacturers.

  Visit WherefourFull verdict →
• Haloglide7.9/10 · Paid

  Serialized identities, event histories and recall analysis for supply-chain traceability.

  Visit HaloglideFull verdict →