Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Oil and Gas Software

Upstream On Demand vs Aspen Tempest

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Upstream On Demand #3 in Oil and Gas Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 6 features Visit site
Aspen Tempest #5 in Oil and Gas Software 8.5/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 6 features Visit Aspen Tempest

Upstream On Demand leads on 5 checks, Aspen Tempest on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreUpstream On Demand · 8.7/10
  • Most featuresUpstream On Demand · 5 of 6

Upstream On Demand scores higher on our rubric for oil and gas software: 8.7 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.

Upstream On Demand offers well management; Aspen Tempest doesn't. Upstream On Demand offers production management; Aspen Tempest doesn't. Upstream On Demand offers hydrocarbon accounting; Aspen Tempest doesn't. Upstream On Demand offers land and lease management; Aspen Tempest doesn't. Upstream On Demand offers regulatory reporting; Aspen Tempest doesn't.

Upstream On Demand is the better fit for teams seeking broad cloud upstream operations. Aspen Tempest is the better fit for reservoir teams running complex simulations.

  • Upstream On Demand fits best

    Teams seeking broad cloud upstream operations

  • Aspen Tempest fits best

    Reservoir teams running complex simulations

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Upstream On Demand 8.7/10 Visit ↗ Aspen Tempest 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.5
Ranking #3 in Oil and Gas Software #5 in Oil and Gas Software
Best for Teams seeking broad cloud upstream operations Reservoir teams running complex simulations
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Self-hosted
Platforms Web Windows, Linux
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Upstream On Demand 5/6 · Aspen Tempest 1/6
Well management ✓ (best) —
Production management ✓ (best) —
Reservoir modeling Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Hydrocarbon accounting ✓ (best) —
Land and lease management ✓ (best) —
Regulatory reporting ✓ (best) —
Our review
Pros
  • Covers well lifecycle and production operations in one suite
  • Includes production accounting, allocation, revenue, and financial workflows
  • Combines land, lease, regulatory, and operational reporting capabilities
  • Supports black-oil, compositional, EOR, and fracturing scenarios
  • Assisted history matching and ensemble-based uncertainty analysis
  • Connects with major commercial and proprietary simulators
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting Quorum Software sales
  • Cloud-hosted web access may not suit on-premises requirements
  • Broad scope may exceed the needs of narrowly focused operators
  • Focused on reservoir workflows rather than production or land management
  • Self-hosted deployment requires environment and administration planning
  • Pricing is handled through a contact-sales process
Our verdict

Upstream On Demand is Quorum Software’s cloud solution for upstream oil and gas operations. It brings well lifecycle management, production tracking, accounting and allocation, upstream revenue, land and lease records, and regulatory…

Read the review →

Aspen Tempest is an integrated reservoir engineering and simulation suite for E&P reservoir engineers working on field appraisal, development planning, optimization, and enhanced oil recovery. Its VIEW module supports simulation input…

Read the review →
  1. Upstream On DemandOil and Gas Software 8.7Pricing on request
  2. Aspen TempestOil and Gas Software 8.5Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Upstream On Demand — where it wins

    • Covers well lifecycle and production operations in one suite
    • Includes production accounting, allocation, revenue, and financial workflows
    • Combines land, lease, regulatory, and operational reporting capabilities

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting Quorum Software sales
    • Cloud-hosted web access may not suit on-premises requirements
    • Broad scope may exceed the needs of narrowly focused operators
  • Aspen Tempest — where it wins

    • Supports black-oil, compositional, EOR, and fracturing scenarios
    • Assisted history matching and ensemble-based uncertainty analysis
    • Connects with major commercial and proprietary simulators

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on reservoir workflows rather than production or land management
    • Self-hosted deployment requires environment and administration planning
    • Pricing is handled through a contact-sales process
  • Upstream On Demand8.7/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad cloud suite covering upstream operations, accounting, land, revenue, and reporting.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • Aspen Tempest8.5/10 · Pricing on request

    A self-hosted reservoir suite for advanced simulation, matching, uncertainty, and optimization.

    Visit Aspen TempestFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update