Head-to-head · Zoo software
Tracks Software vs Fauniabase
Tracks Software leads on 0 checks, Fauniabase on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreTracks Software · 8.5/10
- Most featuresTracks Software · 5 of 5
Tracks Software scores higher on our rubric for zoo software: 8.5 against 7.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #4.
On mobile access, Tracks Software gives you Both where Fauniabase offers Mobile_web.
Tracks Software is the better fit for zoos and aquariums needing flexible deployment. Fauniabase is the better fit for aquariums managing aquatic collections.
- Tracks Software fits best
Zoos and aquariums needing flexible deployment
- Fauniabase fits best
Aquariums managing aquatic collections
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Tracks Software 8.5/10 Visit ↗ | Fauniabase 7.5/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Ranking | #2 in Zoo software | #4 in Zoo software |
| Best for | Zoos and aquariums needing flexible deployment | Aquariums managing aquatic collections |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | — | €89/mo |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop, Mobile | Cloud, Mobile |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, iOS, Android | Web |
| Support | Tickets, Docs | Docs |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Tracks Software 5/5 · Fauniabase 3/5 | ||
| Animal records | ✓ | ✓ |
| Husbandry workflows | ✓ | ✓ |
| Veterinary records | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Collection tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data import/export | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Mobile access | Both | Mobile_web |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Tracks Software brings animal records, collection planning, husbandry, and veterinary workflows together for zoos and aquariums. It is suited to institutions that need to coordinate care and collection information across teams, from animal… Read the review → |
Fauniabase is collection-management software from LUXAQUA for public aquariums, zoos and other wildlife collections, with its features focused on aquatic organisms. It centralizes animal records and inventory, including tanks, and gives… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Tracks Software — where it wins
- Connects animal records with husbandry, veterinary care, and collection planning
- Pocket Tracks supports mobile field data entry and reference
- Offers hosted, self-hosted, desktop, mobile, and API options
Where it doesn't
- Licensing requires a sales discussion rather than published prices
- The annual license fee is based on institution FTE equivalents
- Per-module licensing is custom-priced and limited to one server
Fauniabase — where it wins
- Centralizes aquatic organism records and inventory tracking
- Combines animal-health and water-quality monitoring
- Supports task planning, QR labels and regulatory declarations
Where it doesn't
- Monthly plans start at €89, with no free plan
- Published tiers vary by tanks, users and storage
- The L tier is the only plan explicitly marked with a mobile web app
- Tracks Software8.5/10 · Pricing on request
A broad animal-management system with hosted and self-hosted deployment options.
Contact TracksFull verdict → - Fauniabase7.5/10 · Paid
A focused collection-management system for aquariums, starting at €89 per month.
Visit FauniabaseFull verdict →
Tracks Software vs Fauniabase: questions
Which is better for zoo software, Tracks Software or Fauniabase?
Tracks Software scores higher on our rubric for zoo software: 8.5 against 7.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #4.
How do Tracks Software and Fauniabase compare?
All 6 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.
Do Tracks Software and Fauniabase have a free plan?
Tracks Software: No. Fauniabase: No.
More comparisons
- Antz Platform vs Tracks Software
- Antz Platform vs Fauniabase
- Tracks Software vs EchidnaCare
- EchidnaCare vs Fauniabase
All zoo software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026
Last updated · How we research and update