Head-to-head · 3D Printing Software
Slic3r vs Autodesk Netfabb
Slic3r leads on 0 checks, Autodesk Netfabb on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreSlic3r · 9.0/10
- Free planboth
- Free trialonly Autodesk Netfabb
Slic3r scores higher on our rubric for 3d printing software: 9.0 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.
Slic3r is the better fit for established free FDM slicing. Autodesk Netfabb is the better fit for industrial additive manufacturing preparation.
- Slic3r fits best
Established free FDM slicing
- Autodesk Netfabb fits best
Industrial additive manufacturing preparation
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Slic3r 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | Autodesk Netfabb 8.6/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.6 |
| Ranking | #3 in 3D Printing Software | #5 in 3D Printing Software |
| Best for | Established free FDM slicing | Industrial additive manufacturing preparation |
| Pricing model | Free | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Free plan | — |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | 30 days |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows |
| Support | Community, Docs, Tickets | Docs · 24/7 |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Slic3r 4/6 · Autodesk Netfabb 4/6 | ||
| Auto supports | ✓ | ✓ |
| Printer control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Print monitoring | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Cloud slicing | Not checked yet | — |
| Multi-material tools | ✓ | ✓ |
| Model repair | ✓ | ✓ |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Slic3r is open-source 3D printing software for preparing digital models for FFF/FDM printing. It slices models into layers, generates G-code and toolpaths, and provides visual previews for inspecting print paths. The desktop application… Read the review → |
Autodesk Netfabb is desktop software for preparing additive manufacturing jobs, aimed at additive engineers, industrial designers, and mechanical engineers. Its workflow covers importing, analyzing, repairing, orienting, arranging,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Slic3r — where it wins
- Free, open-source slicing for Windows, macOS, and Linux
- Support generation, mesh repair, and multi-material preparation
- Printer control, OctoPrint integration, and batch processing
Where it doesn't
- Primarily aimed at advanced users
- SLA/DLP workflows are experimental
- The official site lists version 1.3.0 from 2018
Autodesk Netfabb — where it wins
- Mesh repair, orientation, packing, supports, and slicing in one workflow
- Advanced tiers add lattices, toolpaths, scripting, and automation
- Machine-specific workspaces support multiple additive processes and equipment
Where it doesn't
- Runs only on Microsoft Windows
- Advanced capabilities require higher commercial tiers
- Simulation capabilities are limited and edition-dependent
- Slic3r9.0/10 · Free plan
A mature free slicer with multi-material tools, printer control, and OctoPrint integration.
Visit Slic3rFull verdict → - Autodesk Netfabb8.6/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial
A deep Windows workflow for engineers preparing complex additive manufacturing jobs.
Try Autodesk NetfabbFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Bambu Studio vs Slic3r
- Bambu Studio vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OrcaSlicer vs Slic3r
- OrcaSlicer vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Slic3r vs Formlabs PreForm
- Slic3r vs IceSL
- Slic3r vs OctoPrint
- Slic3r vs PrusaSlicer
All 3D printing software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






