Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · AI Drug Discovery Software

Schrödinger LiveDesign vs Boltzmann Labs

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Schrödinger LiveDesign #4 in AI Drug Discovery Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 4 features Request a demo
Boltzmann Labs #7 in AI Drug Discovery Software 7.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit Boltzmann Labs

Schrödinger LiveDesign leads on 0 checks, Boltzmann Labs on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSchrödinger LiveDesign · 8.6/10
  • Free planonly Boltzmann Labs

Schrödinger LiveDesign scores higher on our rubric for ai drug discovery software: 8.6 against 7.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #7.

Boltzmann Labs offers target identification; Schrödinger LiveDesign doesn't. On discovery scope, Boltzmann Labs gives you Suite where Schrödinger LiveDesign offers Molecule.

Schrödinger LiveDesign is the better fit for mid-market and enterprise discovery teams. Boltzmann Labs is the better fit for teams wanting broad molecular design and prediction tools.

  • Schrödinger LiveDesign fits best

    Mid-market and enterprise discovery teams

  • Boltzmann Labs fits best

    Teams wanting broad molecular design and prediction tools

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Schrödinger LiveDesign 8.6/10 Visit ↗ Boltzmann Labs 7.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.6 7.7
Ranking #4 in AI Drug Discovery Software #7 in AI Drug Discovery Software
Best for Mid-market and enterprise discovery teams Teams wanting broad molecular design and prediction tools
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Pricing on request —
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Phone Email, Phone · 24/7
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Schrödinger LiveDesign 2/4 · Boltzmann Labs 2/4
Target identification — ✓ (best)
Molecule design ✓ ✓
Drug repurposing — Not checked yet
Research publications ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Discovery scope Molecule Suite
Deployment options Both Both
Our review
Pros
  • Brings experimental data and in-silico predictions into one workspace
  • Supports AI/ML property models, ligand editing, and docking predictions
  • Tracks compound progression and supports CRO workflow sharing
  • Covers small-molecule design, ADMET, docking and virtual screening
  • Includes protein, antibody, enzyme, peptide and RNA design tools
  • Offers web and API access, cloud or self-hosted deployment, and LIMS integration
Cons
  • Demo-led sales process may slow initial evaluation
  • Focused on molecule discovery, not target identification or drug repurposing
  • Enterprise focus may not suit smaller teams seeking a lighter tool
  • Plan details are credit-based, with capabilities varying by plan
  • Enterprise credits are custom rather than a fixed amount
  • Published INR prices lack a billing period and billing unit
Our verdict

Schrödinger LiveDesign is an enterprise informatics platform for drug-discovery teams working across small molecules and biologics. It is aimed at organizations coordinating design–make–test–analyze work, where researchers need to share…

Read the review →

Boltzmann Labs is a web-based AI drug discovery suite for pharmaceutical and biotechnology research teams seeking tools across molecular design and prediction. Its scope runs from small-molecule generation, lead optimization and ADMET…

Read the review →
  1. Schrödinger LiveDesignAI Drug Discovery Software 8.6Pricing on request
  2. Boltzmann LabsAI Drug Discovery Software 7.7Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Schrödinger LiveDesign — where it wins

    • Brings experimental data and in-silico predictions into one workspace
    • Supports AI/ML property models, ligand editing, and docking predictions
    • Tracks compound progression and supports CRO workflow sharing

    Where it doesn't

    • Demo-led sales process may slow initial evaluation
    • Focused on molecule discovery, not target identification or drug repurposing
    • Enterprise focus may not suit smaller teams seeking a lighter tool

  • Boltzmann Labs — where it wins

    • Covers small-molecule design, ADMET, docking and virtual screening
    • Includes protein, antibody, enzyme, peptide and RNA design tools
    • Offers web and API access, cloud or self-hosted deployment, and LIMS integration

    Where it doesn't

    • Plan details are credit-based, with capabilities varying by plan
    • Enterprise credits are custom rather than a fixed amount
    • Published INR prices lack a billing period and billing unit
  • Schrödinger LiveDesign8.6/10 · Pricing on request

    Connects experimental results, predictions, and compound workflows for research teams.

    Request a demoFull verdict →
  • Boltzmann Labs7.7/10 · Free plan

    A broad molecular discovery suite with credit-based plans, API access and self-hosting.

    Visit Boltzmann LabsFull verdict →

More comparisons

All AI drug discovery software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Guides on AI drug discovery software

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update