RXNT EHR vs Epic Radiant

RXNT EHR8.7Visit Epic Radiant7.1Visit

Higher score RXNT EHR #2 in EHR and EMR Software 8.7/10 Paid ✓ 1 of 4 features Visit RXNT

vs

Epic Radiant #8 in EHR and EMR Software 7.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Epic

• RXNT EHR fits best

  Small practices wanting a priced, mobile-ready EHR

• Epic Radiant fits best

  Large organizations focused on radiology workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	RXNT EHR 8.7/10 Visit ↗	Epic Radiant 7.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.7	7.1
Ranking	#2 in EHR and EMR Software	#8 in EHR and EMR Software
Best for	Small practices wanting a priced, mobile-ready EHR	Large organizations focused on radiology workflows
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	$1,275/yr	Pricing on request
Free plan	—	Not checked yet
Free trial	—	—
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Mid-market, Enterprise
Features RXNT EHR 1/4 · Epic Radiant 0/4
Specialty templates	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
E-prescribing	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Patient portal	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Mobile access	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment	Cloud	Not checked yet
Included users	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Configurable templates, workflows, labs, referrals, and e-faxing iOS and Android access for documentation and scheduling AI-assisted documentation plus integrated patient portal	Coordinates radiology scheduling and exam workflows for technologists and nurses Supports study prioritization, reporting, and actionable finding follow-up Provides performance dashboards and interfaces to PACS and external systems
Cons	No free plan is offered Per-provider billing basis requires clarification before purchase Documented specialty depth is narrower for advanced cardiology data workflows	Pricing requires contacting sales Its focus is radiology rather than broad clinical workflows PACS is not included in its listed category specifications
Our verdict	RXNT EHR is a cloud-based electronic health record for ambulatory practices and healthcare organizations. It combines configurable charting templates and workflows with lab ordering and results, electronic prescribing, referrals, secure… Read the review →	Epic Radiant is a radiology application within Epic’s broader healthcare software offering. It is designed for healthcare organizations coordinating radiology exams, from scheduling and performance through resulting. Technologists and… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• RXNT EHR — where it wins

  • Configurable templates, workflows, labs, referrals, and e-faxing
  • iOS and Android access for documentation and scheduling
  • AI-assisted documentation plus integrated patient portal

  Where it doesn't

  • No free plan is offered
  • Per-provider billing basis requires clarification before purchase
  • Documented specialty depth is narrower for advanced cardiology data workflows

• Epic Radiant — where it wins

  • Coordinates radiology scheduling and exam workflows for technologists and nurses
  • Supports study prioritization, reporting, and actionable finding follow-up
  • Provides performance dashboards and interfaces to PACS and external systems

  Where it doesn't

  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Its focus is radiology rather than broad clinical workflows
  • PACS is not included in its listed category specifications

• RXNT EHR8.7/10 · Paid

  A priced, mobile-ready EHR with charting, prescribing, labs, portals, and AI documentation.

  Visit RXNTFull verdict →
• Epic Radiant7.1/10 · Pricing on request

  An Epic radiology information system for coordinating exams, studies, reporting, and follow-up.

  Visit EpicFull verdict →