Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Cardiology EMR Software

RXNT EHR vs eClinicalWorks Revenue Cycle Management

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side

RXNT EHR leads on 0 checks, eClinicalWorks Revenue Cycle Management on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRXNT EHR · 8.4/10
  • Most featuresRXNT EHR · 1 of 4

RXNT EHR scores higher on our rubric for cardiology emr software: 8.4 against 7.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #6.

RXNT EHR is the better fit for practices seeking EHR plus billing workflows. eClinicalWorks Revenue Cycle Management is the better fit for groups focused mainly on cardiology revenue cycle.

  • RXNT EHR fits best

    Practices seeking EHR plus billing workflows

  • eClinicalWorks Revenue Cycle Management fits best

    Groups focused mainly on cardiology revenue cycle

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature RXNT EHR 8.4/10 Visit ↗ eClinicalWorks Revenue Cycle Management 7.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.4 7.3
Ranking #2 in Cardiology EMR Software #6 in Cardiology EMR Software
Best for Practices seeking EHR plus billing workflows Groups focused mainly on cardiology revenue cycle
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $1,275/yr —
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Support Email, Phone, Docs Phone, Live chat · 24/7
Compliance HIPAA, SOC 2 ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS
Integrations 6 integrations 1 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features RXNT EHR 1/4 · eClinicalWorks Revenue Cycle Management 0/4
Cardiology templates ✓ (best) Not checked yet
ECG integration Not checked yet Not checked yet
DICOM/PACS support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Cardiac device data Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Cloud Not checked yet
Mobile platforms Both Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Templates, lab results, e-prescribing, referrals, and chart-linked e-faxes
  • Full Suite adds practice management, patient portal, billing, and scheduling
  • iOS and Android apps support documentation and scheduling
  • Covers claims, eligibility, remittance posting, denials, appeals, and coding support
  • Offers dashboards, work queues, and central billing support for multiple practices
  • RCM as a Service includes 24x7 support and appeals at all levels
Cons
  • EHR-only pricing does not include the listed billing and scheduling features
  • Cardiology-specific ECG, DICOM/PACS, and device-data workflows are not verified
  • Pricing page does not say whether prices are per provider
  • Focused on revenue cycle rather than a complete cardiology EMR
  • The 2.9% usage-based charge is tied to practice collections
  • Additional implementation fees may apply for practices with more than nine providers
Our verdict

RXNT EHR is a cloud-based electronic health record for ambulatory practices and healthcare organizations, including cardiology practices. It suits teams looking for configurable charting, e-prescribing, lab workflows, referrals, and…

Read the review →

eClinicalWorks Revenue Cycle Management combines billing technology, central billing tools, consulting, and managed RCM services for medical practices, multi-practice organizations, and MSOs. Cardiology groups whose main need is…

Read the review →
  1. RXNT EHRCardiology EMR Software 8.4Paid
  2. eClinicalWorks Revenue Cycle ManagementCardiology EMR Software 7.3Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • RXNT EHR — where it wins

    • Templates, lab results, e-prescribing, referrals, and chart-linked e-faxes
    • Full Suite adds practice management, patient portal, billing, and scheduling
    • iOS and Android apps support documentation and scheduling

    Where it doesn't

    • EHR-only pricing does not include the listed billing and scheduling features
    • Cardiology-specific ECG, DICOM/PACS, and device-data workflows are not verified
    • Pricing page does not say whether prices are per provider
  • eClinicalWorks Revenue Cycle Management — where it wins

    • Covers claims, eligibility, remittance posting, denials, appeals, and coding support
    • Offers dashboards, work queues, and central billing support for multiple practices
    • RCM as a Service includes 24x7 support and appeals at all levels

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on revenue cycle rather than a complete cardiology EMR
    • The 2.9% usage-based charge is tied to practice collections
    • Additional implementation fees may apply for practices with more than nine providers
  • RXNT EHR8.4/10 · Paid

    A configurable cloud EHR with optional practice management, billing, and scheduling.

    Visit RXNTFull verdict →
  • eClinicalWorks Revenue Cycle Management7.3/10 · Paid

    A managed and technology-supported RCM service for practices prioritizing billing operations.

    Visit eClinicalWorksFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update