Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · AI Music Mastering Software

RoEx Mastering vs Masterchannel

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side

RoEx Mastering leads on 0 checks, Masterchannel on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRoEx Mastering · 7.7/10
  • Most featuresRoEx Mastering · 3 of 4

RoEx Mastering scores higher on our rubric for ai music mastering software: 7.7 against 7.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #8.

RoEx Mastering is the better fit for genre-profile and offline mastering users. Masterchannel is the better fit for artists and labels needing batch delivery.

  • RoEx Mastering fits best

    Genre-profile and offline mastering users

  • Masterchannel fits best

    Artists and labels needing batch delivery

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature RoEx Mastering 7.7/10 Visit ↗ Masterchannel 7.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.7 7.6
Ranking #7 in AI Music Mastering Software #8 in AI Music Mastering Software
Best for Genre-profile and offline mastering users Artists and labels needing batch delivery
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not checked yet $15/mo
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Desktop, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, macOS Web
Support Email, Community, Docs Email, Live chat
Built for Solo, Small business Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features RoEx Mastering 3/4 · Masterchannel 2/4
Reference track matching ✓ ✓
Stem mastering — Not checked yet
WAV export ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Loudness targets ✓ ✓
Specs
Monthly masterings Not checked yet Not checked yet
Input formats WAV, FLAC, MP3 WAV
Supported platforms Not checked yet Web
Our review
Pros
  • Reference matching covers tone, dynamics, stereo image, and loudness.
  • Genre profiles and selectable loudness targets support tailored masters.
  • WAV, FLAC, and MP3 exports, plus local offline mastering on macOS.
  • Supports albums, EPs, bulk projects, and unlimited mastering downloads
  • Reference tracks, audio analysis, and detailed tonal controls
  • Web and API access, plus white-label support for partners
Cons
  • There is no free plan.
  • The workflow focuses on stereo mixes rather than stem mastering.
  • Automix Desktop is available as a beta workflow.
  • No free plan for trying the service before subscribing
  • The current beta flow accepts WAV uploads only
  • Higher-volume features require the $79-per-month Partner plan
Our verdict

RoEx Mastering is an AI-powered mastering service for musicians, producers, and independent artists working from stereo mixes. It analyzes a mix and applies equalization, multiband compression, limiting, stereo refinement, loudness…

Read the review →

Masterchannel is an online AI-assisted music mastering service for artists, bedroom producers, professional producers, labels, and studios. It analyzes uploaded tracks and creates masters for streaming and other listening environments. The…

Read the review →
  1. RoEx MasteringAI Music Mastering Software 7.7Paid
  2. MasterchannelAI Music Mastering Software 7.6Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • RoEx Mastering — where it wins

    • Reference matching covers tone, dynamics, stereo image, and loudness.
    • Genre profiles and selectable loudness targets support tailored masters.
    • WAV, FLAC, and MP3 exports, plus local offline mastering on macOS.

    Where it doesn't

    • There is no free plan.
    • The workflow focuses on stereo mixes rather than stem mastering.
    • Automix Desktop is available as a beta workflow.
  • Masterchannel — where it wins

    • Supports albums, EPs, bulk projects, and unlimited mastering downloads
    • Reference tracks, audio analysis, and detailed tonal controls
    • Web and API access, plus white-label support for partners

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan for trying the service before subscribing
    • The current beta flow accepts WAV uploads only
    • Higher-volume features require the $79-per-month Partner plan

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update