Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Scholarship Management Software

Reviewr vs Scholarship Commons

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Reviewr #4 in Scholarship Management Software 9.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 6 features Visit Reviewr
Scholarship Commons #8 in Scholarship Management Software 8.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 6 features Visit Commons

Reviewr leads on 0 checks, Scholarship Commons on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreReviewr · 9.1/10
  • Free planonly Scholarship Commons
  • Most featuresScholarship Commons · 5 of 6

Reviewr scores higher on our rubric for scholarship management software: 9.1 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.

Reviewr is the better fit for structured multi-stage scholarship and grant reviews. Scholarship Commons is the better fit for budget-conscious scholarship programs.

  • Reviewr fits best

    Structured multi-stage scholarship and grant reviews

  • Scholarship Commons fits best

    Budget-conscious scholarship programs

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Reviewr 9.1/10 Visit ↗ Scholarship Commons 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 8.7
Ranking #4 in Scholarship Management Software #8 in Scholarship Management Software
Best for Structured multi-stage scholarship and grant reviews Budget-conscious scholarship programs
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Pricing on request Free plan
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email Email, Docs
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Reviewr 2/6 · Scholarship Commons 5/6
Applicant portal ✓ ✓
Reviewer scoring Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Form builder Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Award administration Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Grant workflows Not checked yet Not checked yet
Workflow automation ✓ ✓
Our review
Pros
  • Conditional forms, eligibility rules and automated disqualification support screening.
  • Blind review, conflict controls and weighted scoring organize committee decisions.
  • Post-award tracking covers acceptance, disbursement, compliance and renewals.
  • Free membership covers core publishing, application, and evaluation workflows
  • Supports blind evaluation, evaluator assignment, and eligibility checks
  • Manages documents, recommendations, recipient announcements, and payment information
Cons
  • Pricing is handled through a contact-sales model.
  • Its workflow depth may exceed the needs of a simple single-stage program.
  • The platform focuses on structured submission and review programs.
  • Operating-agency membership requires contacting Scholarship Commons
  • Web-based delivery may not suit teams needing other platform options
  • Focused scholarship workflows may not fit extensive cross-system operations
Our verdict

Reviewr is a cloud-based application and program management platform for organizations running scholarships, grants, awards, fellowships, competitions and other submission programs. It is suited to nonprofits, foundations, associations,…

Read the review →

Scholarship Commons is a web-based scholarship management platform from MintSage Inc. It brings scholarship administrators, students, recommenders, and evaluators into one workflow, covering program publishing, applications, evaluations,…

Read the review →
  1. ReviewrScholarship Management Software 9.1Pricing on request
  2. Scholarship CommonsScholarship Management Software 8.7Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Reviewr — where it wins

    • Conditional forms, eligibility rules and automated disqualification support screening.
    • Blind review, conflict controls and weighted scoring organize committee decisions.
    • Post-award tracking covers acceptance, disbursement, compliance and renewals.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through a contact-sales model.
    • Its workflow depth may exceed the needs of a simple single-stage program.
    • The platform focuses on structured submission and review programs.

  • Scholarship Commons — where it wins

    • Free membership covers core publishing, application, and evaluation workflows
    • Supports blind evaluation, evaluator assignment, and eligibility checks
    • Manages documents, recommendations, recipient announcements, and payment information

    Where it doesn't

    • Operating-agency membership requires contacting Scholarship Commons
    • Web-based delivery may not suit teams needing other platform options
    • Focused scholarship workflows may not fit extensive cross-system operations
  • Reviewr9.1/10 · Pricing on request

    A structured platform for managing applications, reviews, decisions and post-award work.

    Visit ReviewrFull verdict →
  • Scholarship Commons8.7/10 · Free plan

    A focused, budget-conscious platform for managing scholarship programs online.

    Visit CommonsFull verdict →

More comparisons

All scholarship management software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update