Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · No-Code Database Software

Ragic vs NocoBase

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Ragic #5 in No-Code Database Software 8.8/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Ragic
NocoBase #13 in No-Code Database Software 8.0/10 Free plan · 2-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 5 of 5 features Visit NocoBase

Ragic leads on 0 checks, NocoBase on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRagic · 8.8/10
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialboth

Ragic scores higher on our rubric for no-code database software: 8.8 against 8.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #13.

On deployment, Ragic gives you Both where NocoBase offers Self_hosted.

Ragic is the better fit for established teams needing mobile and offline databases. NocoBase is the better fit for self-hosted teams needing extensible business apps.

  • Ragic fits best

    Established teams needing mobile and offline databases

  • NocoBase fits best

    Self-hosted teams needing extensible business apps

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Ragic 8.8/10 Visit ↗ NocoBase 8.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.0
Ranking #5 in No-Code Database Software #13 in No-Code Database Software
Best for Established teams needing mobile and offline databases Self-hosted teams needing extensible business apps
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $5/user/mo $800 one-time
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 30 days 2 days
Free trial length 30 days · no card needed 2 days
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted, Mobile Self-hosted
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Support Email, Live chat, Community, Docs, Tickets Community, Docs
Integrations 8 integrations 11 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Ragic 5/5 · NocoBase 5/5
Relational data ✓ ✓
Permission controls ✓ ✓
App interface builder ✓ ✓
Workflow automation ✓ ✓
API access ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment Both Self_hosted
Record limit 1000 records Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Relational sheets, linked records, and subtables support complex operational data.
  • Granular permissions, workflows, and action buttons support controlled processes.
  • Mobile apps offer offline support, with cloud and on-premises deployment options.
  • Relational modeling covers one-to-one through many-to-many relationships
  • Fine-grained permissions include data, menu, plugin, and field access
  • Self-hosting, full source code, APIs, plugins, and workflow automation
Cons
  • The Free plan limits teams to three custom sheets and 1,000 records each.
  • Advanced plans become costly, especially concurrent-user and dedicated-server options.
  • Its broad configuration model may require more planning than simpler database tools.
  • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage their own infrastructure
  • Paid editions begin at a high one-time license price
  • Advanced capabilities are reserved for higher paid editions
Our verdict

Ragic is a no-code platform for building customizable business database applications. It suits established teams managing operational data across related tables, forms, approval processes, and user groups. Teams can create custom sheets,…

Read the review →

NocoBase is an open-source AI and no-code platform for building business systems and internal tools. It suits self-hosted teams that need more than a basic table interface, especially when relational data, custom application screens,…

Read the review →
  1. RagicNo-Code Database Software 8.8Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. NocoBaseNo-Code Database Software 8.0Free plan · 2-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Ragic — where it wins

    • Relational sheets, linked records, and subtables support complex operational data.
    • Granular permissions, workflows, and action buttons support controlled processes.
    • Mobile apps offer offline support, with cloud and on-premises deployment options.

    Where it doesn't

    • The Free plan limits teams to three custom sheets and 1,000 records each.
    • Advanced plans become costly, especially concurrent-user and dedicated-server options.
    • Its broad configuration model may require more planning than simpler database tools.
  • NocoBase — where it wins

    • Relational modeling covers one-to-one through many-to-many relationships
    • Fine-grained permissions include data, menu, plugin, and field access
    • Self-hosting, full source code, APIs, plugins, and workflow automation

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage their own infrastructure
    • Paid editions begin at a high one-time license price
    • Advanced capabilities are reserved for higher paid editions
  • Ragic8.8/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    A mature relational database builder with flexible controls, workflows, and deployment options.

    Visit RagicFull verdict →
  • NocoBase8.0/10 · Free plan · 2-day trial

    A self-hosted no-code builder with deep data modeling, workflows, permissions, and APIs.

    Visit NocoBaseFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update