Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) Software

RADAN vs SigmaNEST

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
RADAN #5 in Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) Software —/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 5 features Visit Hexagon
SigmaNEST #6 in Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) Software —/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 5 features Visit SigmaNEST

RADAN leads on 1 check, SigmaNEST on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Most featuresRADAN · 3 of 5

Our editors rank RADAN at #5 and SigmaNEST at #6 for computer-aided manufacturing (cam) software; RADAN and SigmaNEST have no rubric score yet (facts researched, not yet scored), so the checks below decide.

RADAN offers machine simulation; SigmaNEST doesn't publish it.

RADAN is the better fit for sheet-metal shops programming cutting and bending. SigmaNEST is the better fit for cutting shops optimizing sheet use and CNC programming.

  • RADAN fits best

    Sheet-metal shops programming cutting and bending

  • SigmaNEST fits best

    Cutting shops optimizing sheet use and CNC programming

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature RADAN —/10 Visit ↗ SigmaNEST —/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score — —
Ranking #5 in Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) Software #6 in Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) Software
Best for Sheet-metal shops programming cutting and bending Cutting shops optimizing sheet use and CNC programming
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan Not published —
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Desktop
Platforms Windows Windows
Support Tickets, Docs Email, Phone
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features RADAN 3/5 · SigmaNEST 2/5
Toolpath simulation ✓ ✓
Machine simulation ✓ (best) Not published
Post-processor library ✓ ✓
Turning support Not published —
Mill-turn support Not published —
Specs
Simultaneous axes Not published Not published
Deployment model Desktop Desktop
Our review
Pros
  • Covers punching, profiling, bending, tube cutting and quoting workflows
  • True-shape nesting helps plan sheet utilization
  • 3D tube-cutting simulation includes collision warnings
  • Automatic nesting supports efforts to reduce sheet-material waste.
  • Programs laser, plasma, oxyfuel, waterjet, punching and combination machines.
  • Includes configurable post-processing, toolpath simulation and production reports.
Cons
  • Runs as a desktop application on Windows
  • Capabilities vary by the RADAN modules purchased
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Runs as a Windows desktop application, limiting platform choice.
  • Pricing requires contacting sales rather than selecting a published plan.
  • Does not support turning or mill-turn workflows.
Our verdict

RADAN is Hexagon’s CAD/CAM suite for sheet-metal fabricators and manufacturers. It brings programming for punching, profiling and bending together with true-shape nesting, tube and profile cutting, quoting and CAD import. The product is…

Read the review →

SigmaNEST brings CAD/CAM programming and sheet nesting together for fabrication shops and manufacturers managing CNC cutting workflows. Its feature set covers importing and editing CAD geometry, arranging parts on sheets, generating CNC…

Read the review →
  1. RADANComputer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) Software —Pricing on request
  2. SigmaNESTComputer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) Software —Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • RADAN — where it wins

    • Covers punching, profiling, bending, tube cutting and quoting workflows
    • True-shape nesting helps plan sheet utilization
    • 3D tube-cutting simulation includes collision warnings

    Where it doesn't

    • Runs as a desktop application on Windows
    • Capabilities vary by the RADAN modules purchased
    • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • SigmaNEST — where it wins

    • Automatic nesting supports efforts to reduce sheet-material waste.
    • Programs laser, plasma, oxyfuel, waterjet, punching and combination machines.
    • Includes configurable post-processing, toolpath simulation and production reports.

    Where it doesn't

    • Runs as a Windows desktop application, limiting platform choice.
    • Pricing requires contacting sales rather than selecting a published plan.
    • Does not support turning or mill-turn workflows.
  • RADAN—/10 · Pricing on request

    A modular Windows suite for programming, nesting, bending, quoting and tube cutting.

    Visit HexagonFull verdict →
  • SigmaNEST—/10 · Pricing on request

    SigmaNEST pairs sheet nesting with CNC programming and production tools for fabrication workflows.

    Visit SigmaNESTFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026