Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · AI Writing Tools

QuillBot vs Jasper

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score QuillBot #2 in AI Writing Tools 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Visit QuillBot
Jasper #3 in AI Writing Tools 9.1/10 7-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Jasper

QuillBot leads on 2 checks, Jasper on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreQuillBot · 9.2/10
  • Lowest starting priceQuillBot · $8.33/mo
  • Free planonly QuillBot
  • Free trialonly Jasper
  • Most featuresJasper · 4 of 4

QuillBot scores higher on our rubric for ai writing tools: 9.2 against 9.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #3.

QuillBot offers free plan; Jasper doesn't. QuillBot is cheaper to start at $8.33/user/mo against $59/user/mo.

QuillBot is the better fit for writers needing editing and rewriting assistance. Jasper is the better fit for large marketing teams with budgets.

  • QuillBot fits best

    Writers needing editing and rewriting assistance

  • Jasper fits best

    Large marketing teams with budgets

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature QuillBot 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Jasper 9.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 9.1
Ranking #2 in AI Writing Tools #3 in AI Writing Tools
Best for Writers needing editing and rewriting assistance Large marketing teams with budgets
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $8.33/mo (best) $59/seat/mo
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — 7 days
Deployment Cloud, Desktop, Mobile, Browser extension Cloud, Browser extension
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Chrome extension Web, Chrome extension
Support Docs Email, Tickets, Community, Docs
Integrations 8 integrations 1,000+ integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features QuillBot 2/4 · Jasper 4/4
Brand voice controls Not published by the vendor (checked 27 Oct 2026) ✓ (best)
Long-form writing Not published by the vendor (checked 27 Oct 2026) ✓ (best)
SEO features ✓ ✓
Team collaboration ✓ ✓
Specs
Content templates Not checked yet Not checked yet
Language support Multilingual Multilingual
Native integrations Not checked yet 1000
Our review
Pros
  • Free plan includes paraphrasing, grammar correction, summaries, and AI detection
  • Works across web, desktop, mobile, browsers, Word, and Google Docs
  • Combines rewriting, translation, citations, chat, detection, and image generation
  • AI agents cover research, creation, translation, personalization, and optimization
  • Brand Voice, Knowledge, audiences, and governance support controlled content creation
  • Canvas, Grid, API access, and 18 integrations fit coordinated marketing workflows
Cons
  • Free paraphrasing is limited to 125 words and 2 modes
  • Brand voice, SEO, and original long-form generation are less complete
  • The broad toolset may be more than writers seeking one focused editor need
  • No free plan limits low-cost evaluation
  • The $59 annual price is per user per month
  • The broad feature set may exceed the needs of simple writing users
Our verdict

QuillBot is a freemium suite of AI writing and creation tools for students, professionals, content creators, and other writers. Its core capabilities cover paraphrasing and rewriting, grammar and spelling checks, summarization,…

Read the review →

Jasper is an AI marketing platform for marketing teams and enterprises that need to research, create, adapt, translate, personalize, and optimize written and visual content. Its focus extends beyond drafting: AI agents support core…

Read the review →
  1. QuillBotAI Writing Tools 9.2Free plan
  2. JasperAI Writing Tools 9.17-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • QuillBot — where it wins

    • Free plan includes paraphrasing, grammar correction, summaries, and AI detection
    • Works across web, desktop, mobile, browsers, Word, and Google Docs
    • Combines rewriting, translation, citations, chat, detection, and image generation

    Where it doesn't

    • Free paraphrasing is limited to 125 words and 2 modes
    • Brand voice, SEO, and original long-form generation are less complete
    • The broad toolset may be more than writers seeking one focused editor need

  • Jasper — where it wins

    • AI agents cover research, creation, translation, personalization, and optimization
    • Brand Voice, Knowledge, audiences, and governance support controlled content creation
    • Canvas, Grid, API access, and 18 integrations fit coordinated marketing workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan limits low-cost evaluation
    • The $59 annual price is per user per month
    • The broad feature set may exceed the needs of simple writing users
  • QuillBot9.2/10 · Free plan

    A broad writing assistant for editing, rewriting, summaries, citations, and AI-supported drafting.

    Visit QuillBotFull verdict →
  • Jasper9.1/10 · 7-day trial

    A broad AI marketing workspace for teams that need brand control, optimization, and collaboration.

    Visit JasperFull verdict →

More comparisons

All AI writing tools comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update