Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Content Management Systems

Plone vs Sulu

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 7 checks side by side
Higher score Plone #9 in Content Management Systems 8.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 6 of 6 features Visit Plone
Sulu #22 in Content Management Systems 6.7/10 Open source ✓ 6 of 6 features Visit Sulu

Plone leads on 0 checks, Sulu on 0, and 7 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorePlone · 8.3/10
  • Free planonly Plone

Plone scores higher on our rubric for content management systems: 8.3 against 6.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #9 and #22.

On platform type, Plone gives you Hybrid where Sulu offers Self_hosted.

Plone is the better fit for governed enterprise publishing and intranets. Sulu is the better fit for multisite and multilingual organizations.

  • Plone fits best

    Governed enterprise publishing and intranets

  • Sulu fits best

    Multisite and multilingual organizations

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Plone 8.3/10 Visit ↗ Sulu 6.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.3 6.7
Ranking #9 in Content Management Systems #22 in Content Management Systems
Best for Governed enterprise publishing and intranets Multisite and multilingual organizations
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Community, Live chat, Docs Email, Community, Docs
Integrations 8 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Plone 6/6 · Sulu 6/6
Editorial workflows ✓ ✓
Custom user roles ✓ ✓
Multilingual content ✓ ✓
SEO tools ✓ ✓
Media library ✓ ✓
Custom content types ✓ ✓
Specs
Platform type Hybrid Self_hosted
Our review
Pros
  • Configurable workflows, publishing states, versioning, and content locking
  • Structured content, multilingual support, search, and asset management
  • REST API plus broad enterprise authentication integrations
  • Multisite and multilingual content management with localization controls
  • Editorial workflows cover revision, approval, publishing, and archiving
  • Fine-grained permissions, reusable blocks, SEO, media, and headless delivery
Cons
  • Hosting, implementation, and support may require separate providers
  • Self-hosted deployments place infrastructure choices with the organization
  • Its broad governance feature set may exceed simpler publishing needs
  • Self-hosted operation requires deployment and infrastructure ownership
  • Its feature depth may exceed the needs of a simple single-site CMS
  • PHP and Symfony expertise is relevant for implementation and customization
Our verdict

Plone is an open-source content management system for websites, intranets, and custom applications. It suits organizations that need governed publishing rather than only basic page editing, with browser-based content editing, structured…

Read the review →

Sulu is an open-source content management system for PHP and Symfony developers building complex websites, web applications, and content-driven platforms. It supports multisite webspace management, multilingual content, structured page…

Read the review →
  1. PloneContent Management Systems 8.3Free plan
  2. SuluContent Management Systems 6.7Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Plone — where it wins

    • Configurable workflows, publishing states, versioning, and content locking
    • Structured content, multilingual support, search, and asset management
    • REST API plus broad enterprise authentication integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Hosting, implementation, and support may require separate providers
    • Self-hosted deployments place infrastructure choices with the organization
    • Its broad governance feature set may exceed simpler publishing needs
  • Sulu — where it wins

    • Multisite and multilingual content management with localization controls
    • Editorial workflows cover revision, approval, publishing, and archiving
    • Fine-grained permissions, reusable blocks, SEO, media, and headless delivery

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted operation requires deployment and infrastructure ownership
    • Its feature depth may exceed the needs of a simple single-site CMS
    • PHP and Symfony expertise is relevant for implementation and customization
  • Plone8.3/10 · Free plan

    A mature, free CMS for structured, multilingual, permission-controlled publishing.

    Visit PloneFull verdict →
  • Sulu6.7/10 · Open source

    A flexible open-source CMS for organizations managing multilingual, multisite content.

    Visit SuluFull verdict →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update