Head-to-head · Dental Imaging Software
Planmeca Romexis vs Diagnocat
Planmeca Romexis leads on 0 checks, Diagnocat on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scorePlanmeca Romexis · 9.0/10
Planmeca Romexis scores higher on our rubric for dental imaging software: 9.0 against 7.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #4.
Planmeca Romexis is the better fit for practices needing broad imaging and mature integrations. Diagnocat is the better fit for AI-driven radiology and patient-ready reports.
- Planmeca Romexis fits best
Practices needing broad imaging and mature integrations
- Diagnocat fits best
AI-driven radiology and patient-ready reports
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Planmeca Romexis 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | Diagnocat 7.5/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Ranking | #1 in Dental Imaging Software | #4 in Dental Imaging Software |
| Best for | Practices needing broad imaging and mature integrations | AI-driven radiology and patient-ready reports |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | Not published | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Desktop | Cloud, Desktop |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, iOS | Web, Windows, macOS |
| Support | Docs | Live chat |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market |
| Features Planmeca Romexis 4/4 · Diagnocat 4/4 | ||
| CBCT/3D viewer | ✓ | ✓ |
| DICOM support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Intraoral device support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Patient image sharing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Modality support | 2d_and_3d | 2d_and_3d |
| Deployment | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Included storage | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Planmeca Romexis brings dental image capture, viewing and processing together with treatment and digital dentistry workflows. Its scope spans 2D intraoral, panoramic and cephalometric imaging, CBCT analysis, implant planning, orthodontics,… Read the review → |
Diagnocat is a dental imaging application for dental professionals, clinics and laboratories. It analyzes CBCT, panoramic and intraoral X-ray images, then generates radiological findings, visualizations and reports. Web access, cloud… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Planmeca Romexis — where it wins
- Combines 2D imaging, CBCT viewing, analysis and implant workflows
- AI recognition supports tooth, anatomy and nerve identification
- Connects with over 100 dental practice-management systems
Where it doesn't
- Requires contacting a local distributor for pricing
- Desktop application, with hosted Image Cloud available as an option
- Broad module set may exceed the needs of practices seeking basic imaging
Diagnocat — where it wins
- Analyzes CBCT, panoramic and intraoral X-ray images with AI
- Converts CBCT segments into STL models for 3D workflows
- Creates implant, orthodontic and patient-friendly printable reports
Where it doesn't
- No free plan is offered
- Clinical interpretation remains the clinician’s responsibility
- Support is listed through chat
- Planmeca Romexis9.0/10 · Pricing on request
A broad desktop imaging suite with AI, implant planning and extensive integrations.
Visit PlanmecaFull verdict → - Diagnocat7.5/10 · From €299/mo (annual)
AI reports and 3D planning for practices needing patient-ready dental imaging workflows.
Visit DiagnocatFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Planmeca Romexis vs DEXIS Imaging Suite
- Planmeca Romexis vs AIS (ACTEON Imaging Suite)
- Planmeca Romexis vs CS Imaging
- Planmeca Romexis vs MiPACS Dental Enterprise Viewer
- Planmeca Romexis vs Invivo
- Planmeca Romexis vs NewTom NNT
- DEXIS Imaging Suite vs Diagnocat
- AIS (ACTEON Imaging Suite) vs Diagnocat
All dental imaging software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update




