Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Java CMS

OpenText TeamSite vs Enonic XP

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score OpenText TeamSite #1 in Java CMS 9.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit OpenText
Enonic XP #8 in Java CMS 8.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Enonic

OpenText TeamSite leads on 0 checks, Enonic XP on 1, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText TeamSite · 9.2/10
  • Free planonly Enonic XP
  • Most featuresOpenText TeamSite · 3 of 3

OpenText TeamSite scores higher on our rubric for java cms: 9.2 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #8.

Enonic XP offers free plan; OpenText TeamSite doesn't. On content apis, Enonic XP gives you Graphql where OpenText TeamSite offers Rest.

OpenText TeamSite is the better fit for large enterprises managing complex web experiences. Enonic XP is the better fit for teams building localized, API-driven digital experiences.

  • OpenText TeamSite fits best

    Large enterprises managing complex web experiences

  • Enonic XP fits best

    Teams building localized, API-driven digital experiences

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText TeamSite 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Enonic XP 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.3
Ranking #1 in Java CMS #8 in Java CMS
Best for Large enterprises managing complex web experiences Teams building localized, API-driven digital experiences
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Pricing on request —
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs Community, Phone, Tickets, Docs
Built for Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText TeamSite 3/3 · Enonic XP 1/3
Headless delivery ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Content workflow ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Localization ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment Both Not checked yet
Java version support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Content APIs Rest Graphql
Our review
Pros
  • Supports coupled, headless, and hybrid content delivery
  • Combines multisite management, workflows, and localization
  • Offers WYSIWYG authoring, personalization, testing, and GenAI features
  • Free plan includes solution templates and developer guides
  • GraphQL delivery, image transformations, and localization layers
  • Choose managed cloud hosting or self-hosted deployment
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • The product is positioned for enterprise organizations
  • Listed support channel is documentation
  • Professional and Enterprise pricing requires contacting Enonic
  • The Free plan is positioned for developers
  • Custom APIs may be needed for protocols beyond GraphQL
Our verdict

OpenText TeamSite, now presented as OpenText Web CMS, is an enterprise content management system for organizations creating and publishing digital experiences across channels. It brings together web authoring, publishing, multisite…

Read the review →

Enonic XP is a headless and hybrid CMS for organizations building websites, digital experiences, and API-driven applications. Its structured content types and schemas provide a basis for modeling content, while Content Studio offers visual…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText TeamSiteJava CMS 9.2Pricing on request
  2. Enonic XPJava CMS 8.3Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText TeamSite — where it wins

    • Supports coupled, headless, and hybrid content delivery
    • Combines multisite management, workflows, and localization
    • Offers WYSIWYG authoring, personalization, testing, and GenAI features

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • The product is positioned for enterprise organizations
    • Listed support channel is documentation
  • Enonic XP — where it wins

    • Free plan includes solution templates and developer guides
    • GraphQL delivery, image transformations, and localization layers
    • Choose managed cloud hosting or self-hosted deployment

    Where it doesn't

    • Professional and Enterprise pricing requires contacting Enonic
    • The Free plan is positioned for developers
    • Custom APIs may be needed for protocols beyond GraphQL
  • OpenText TeamSite9.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A flexible enterprise CMS for multisite publishing across coupled, headless, and hybrid setups.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
  • Enonic XP8.3/10 · Free plan

    A flexible Java CMS for teams building websites and API-driven experiences.

    Visit EnonicFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update