Head-to-head · Manuscript Submission Software
OpenReview vs Sciencesconf
OpenReview leads on 0 checks, Sciencesconf on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreOpenReview · 9.0/10
- Free planboth
OpenReview scores higher on our rubric for manuscript submission software: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.
OpenReview is the better fit for venues needing configurable, open peer review. Sciencesconf is the better fit for research events needing free multi-stage review.
- OpenReview fits best
Venues needing configurable, open peer review
- Sciencesconf fits best
Research events needing free multi-stage review
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | OpenReview 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | Sciencesconf 8.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Ranking | #3 in Manuscript Submission Software | #5 in Manuscript Submission Software |
| Best for | Venues needing configurable, open peer review | Research events needing free multi-stage review |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Docs | Email, Docs |
| Integrations | 1 integrations | 1 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features OpenReview 0/5 · Sciencesconf 0/5 | ||
| Conference submissions | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Multi-journal management | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Configurable intake forms | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Automated email notices | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| ORCID integration | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | OpenReview supports paper and abstract submissions, reviewer coordination, discussion, decisions, and publication for conferences, workshops, journals, symposia, and other reviewing entities. It is aimed at organizers who need to shape… Read the review → |
Sciencesconf is a web platform for higher-education and research institutions organizing scientific conferences, workshops, and meetings. It brings event websites, abstract and full-text submission, peer review, programming, registration,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
OpenReview — where it wins
- Configurable review policies, visibility settings, and multi-stage workflows
- Reviewer-paper matching and conflict-of-interest management
- REST API supports records, assignments, permissions, and automation
Where it doesn't
- No documented schedule-building capability
- Focuses on review workflows, with less evidence for broader publishing operations
- Venue setup requires organizers to configure roles, forms, visibility, and deadlines
Sciencesconf — where it wins
- Supports abstract and full-text submissions, including oral and poster types
- Configurable reviewer scoring, blinded review, and author revision workflows
- Provides proceedings editing and export to HAL
Where it doesn't
- Its focus is scientific events rather than general manuscript workflows
- The listed integration is limited to HAL
- Available as a web platform, with no other platform listed
- OpenReview9.0/10 · Free plan
A free, configurable review workflow for conferences, journals, workshops, and symposia.
Visit OpenReviewFull verdict → - Sciencesconf8.8/10 · Free plan
A free web platform for scientific events with configurable submissions and multi-stage review.
Visit SciencesconfFull verdict →
More comparisons
- OpenReview vs Open Journal Systems
- OpenReview vs Scholastica
- OpenReview vs ConfTool
- OpenReview vs EDAS
- Open Journal Systems vs Sciencesconf
- Sciencesconf vs Scholastica
- Sciencesconf vs ConfTool
- Sciencesconf vs EDAS
All manuscript submission software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update

