Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · EHR and EMR Software

OpenMRS vs ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score OpenMRS #4 in EHR and EMR Software 7.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit OpenMRS
ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery #7 in EHR and EMR Software 7.4/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 4 features Contact ModMed

OpenMRS leads on 1 check, ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenMRS · 7.9/10
  • Free planonly OpenMRS
  • Most featuresModMed EMA Plastic Surgery · 1 of 4

OpenMRS scores higher on our rubric for ehr and emr software: 7.9 against 7.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #7.

OpenMRS offers free plan; ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery doesn't.

OpenMRS is the better fit for organizations needing a flexible, no-license-cost EHR. ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery is the better fit for plastic surgery practices needing image and procedure tools.

  • OpenMRS fits best

    Organizations needing a flexible, no-license-cost EHR

  • ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery fits best

    Plastic surgery practices needing image and procedure tools

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenMRS 7.9/10 Visit ↗ ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery 7.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.4
Ranking #4 in EHR and EMR Software #7 in EHR and EMR Software
Best for Organizations needing a flexible, no-license-cost EHR Plastic surgery practices needing image and procedure tools
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Free plan Pricing on request
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Mobile
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web, iOS
Support Email, Live chat, Community, Docs Phone, Email, Tickets, Community, Docs
Integrations 4 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenMRS 0/4 · ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery 1/4
Specialty templates Not checked yet Not checked yet
E-prescribing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Patient portal Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Mobile access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Included users Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports inpatient and outpatient clinical documentation and orders
  • Offers configurable forms, medication workflows, and patient queues
  • Provides REST and FHIR APIs plus cloud or self-hosted deployment
  • Specialty templates support clinical notes and suggested coding.
  • Photo tools tag, annotate and attach images to patient charts.
  • Digital consents, e-prescribing, scheduling and billing support key workflows.
Cons
  • Requires organizations to configure and operate an open-source system
  • Offers broad workflows that may exceed the needs of a narrow clinic
  • No paid plans or published commercial pricing are shown
  • Pricing is provided through vendor contact rather than published per-user rates.
  • The EMA app is iPad-oriented, which may not suit every mobile workflow.
  • Online booking scope may depend on the broader ModMed suite.
Our verdict

OpenMRS is an open-source electronic medical record platform for healthcare facilities, including primary-care clinics, specialty centers, and hospital-based inpatient programs. Its scope includes clinical documentation, diagnosis…

Read the review →

Plastic surgery practices handling cosmetic, reconstructive and aesthetic medicine workflows are the audience for ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery. It combines an electronic health record with practice-management functions, including clinical…

Read the review →
  1. OpenMRSEHR and EMR Software 7.9Free plan
  2. ModMed EMA Plastic SurgeryEHR and EMR Software 7.4Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenMRS — where it wins

    • Supports inpatient and outpatient clinical documentation and orders
    • Offers configurable forms, medication workflows, and patient queues
    • Provides REST and FHIR APIs plus cloud or self-hosted deployment

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires organizations to configure and operate an open-source system
    • Offers broad workflows that may exceed the needs of a narrow clinic
    • No paid plans or published commercial pricing are shown
  • ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery — where it wins

    • Specialty templates support clinical notes and suggested coding.
    • Photo tools tag, annotate and attach images to patient charts.
    • Digital consents, e-prescribing, scheduling and billing support key workflows.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is provided through vendor contact rather than published per-user rates.
    • The EMA app is iPad-oriented, which may not suit every mobile workflow.
    • Online booking scope may depend on the broader ModMed suite.
  • OpenMRS7.9/10 · Free plan

    A configurable, no-license-cost EHR with clinical workflows and FHIR APIs.

    Visit OpenMRSFull verdict →
  • ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery7.4/10 · Pricing on request

    Specialty documentation and photo tools for plastic surgery practices, with sales-led pricing.

    Contact ModMedFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update