Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Virtual Routers Software

Nokia Virtualized Service Router vs Palo Alto Networks VM-Series

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Nokia Virtualized Service Router #3 in Virtual Routers Software 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Nokia
Palo Alto Networks VM-Series #8 in Virtual Routers Software 8.2/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 2 features Visit site

Nokia Virtualized Service Router leads on 0 checks, Palo Alto Networks VM-Series on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreNokia Virtualized Service Router · 8.9/10

Nokia Virtualized Service Router scores higher on our rubric for virtual routers software: 8.9 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.

Nokia Virtualized Service Router is the better fit for operators needing virtualized service-provider functions. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is the better fit for cloud teams needing virtual firewall and basic routing.

  • Nokia Virtualized Service Router fits best

    Operators needing virtualized service-provider functions

  • Palo Alto Networks VM-Series fits best

    Cloud teams needing virtual firewall and basic routing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Nokia Virtualized Service Router 8.9/10 Visit ↗ Palo Alto Networks VM-Series 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.2
Ranking #3 in Virtual Routers Software #8 in Virtual Routers Software
Best for Operators needing virtualized service-provider functions Cloud teams needing virtual firewall and basic routing
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Linux Web
Integrations 3 integrations 12 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Nokia Virtualized Service Router 2/2 · Palo Alto Networks VM-Series 2/2
VPN support ✓ ✓
High availability ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment type Not checked yet Not checked yet
Routing protocols BGP, OSPF, IS-IS, RIP BGP, OSPF, OSPFv3, RIP, static routing
Max throughput Not checked yet Not checked yet
Cloud platforms Not checked yet Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, Alibaba Cloud
Our review
Pros
  • Supports IP/MPLS edge services across business, residential and mobile networks.
  • Combines BNG, L2TP, residential gateway, NAT and IPsec functions.
  • Offers VM or container deployment with multi-node resiliency options.
  • Inspects traffic at Layer 7 with inline security controls
  • Supports BGP, OSPF, OSPFv3, RIP and static routing
  • Runs across major public clouds and virtualization platforms
Cons
  • Pricing is handled through contact sales.
  • Scaling depends on adding CPU and memory resources.
  • Its focus on service-provider functions may not suit simpler routing needs.
  • Security-focused rather than a deep standalone routing platform
  • Pricing requires a sales conversation
  • No general free plan
Our verdict

Nokia Virtualized Service Router is IP edge routing software based on Nokia’s Service Router Operating System. It is aimed at service providers, cloud providers and mission-critical enterprise environments that need virtualized network…

Read the review →

Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is a virtualized next-generation firewall for protecting workloads and inspecting traffic across public and private clouds, virtualized data centers, and enterprise branches. It is aimed at mid-market and…

Read the review →
  1. Nokia Virtualized Service RouterVirtual Routers Software 8.9Pricing on request
  2. Palo Alto Networks VM-SeriesVirtual Routers Software 8.2Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Nokia Virtualized Service Router — where it wins

    • Supports IP/MPLS edge services across business, residential and mobile networks.
    • Combines BNG, L2TP, residential gateway, NAT and IPsec functions.
    • Offers VM or container deployment with multi-node resiliency options.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through contact sales.
    • Scaling depends on adding CPU and memory resources.
    • Its focus on service-provider functions may not suit simpler routing needs.
  • Palo Alto Networks VM-Series — where it wins

    • Inspects traffic at Layer 7 with inline security controls
    • Supports BGP, OSPF, OSPFv3, RIP and static routing
    • Runs across major public clouds and virtualization platforms

    Where it doesn't

    • Security-focused rather than a deep standalone routing platform
    • Pricing requires a sales conversation
    • No general free plan
  • Nokia Virtualized Service Router8.9/10 · Pricing on request

    A service-provider-focused virtual router spanning IP/MPLS, broadband, NAT and IPsec functions.

    Visit NokiaFull verdict →
  • Palo Alto Networks VM-Series8.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A cloud-ready virtual firewall with core routing protocols, VPNs and high availability.

    Visit siteFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update