Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Web Frameworks

Next.js vs Buffalo

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Next.js #3 in Web Frameworks 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Next.js
Buffalo #13 in Web Frameworks 7.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Buffalo

Next.js leads on 0 checks, Buffalo on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreNext.js · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresBuffalo · 1 of 2

Next.js scores higher on our rubric for web frameworks: 9.0 against 7.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #13.

Buffalo offers included orm; Next.js doesn't.

Next.js is the better fit for teams building full-stack React applications. Buffalo is the better fit for go teams wanting an integrated full-stack toolkit.

  • Next.js fits best

    Teams building full-stack React applications

  • Buffalo fits best

    Go teams wanting an integrated full-stack toolkit

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Next.js 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Buffalo 7.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 7.6
Ranking #3 in Web Frameworks #13 in Web Frameworks
Best for Teams building full-stack React applications Go teams wanting an integrated full-stack toolkit
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted, Cloud
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Next.js 0/2 · Buffalo 1/2
Included ORM — ✓ (best)
Built-in authentication — Not checked yet
Specs
Framework type Full-stack Full-stack
Primary languages JavaScript, TypeScript Go
Rendering modes Hybrid Hybrid
Deployment targets Self-hosted Self-hosted
License model Open-source Open-source
Our review
Pros
  • Hybrid rendering combines server rendering, static generation, and static export.
  • Route Handlers support backend endpoints within the application.
  • Built-in image optimization and TypeScript configuration support included.
  • Combines routing, middleware, sessions, cookies, and error handling
  • Includes Plush templates, Webpack asset handling, and hot code reloading
  • Provides Pop database tooling, background workers, and application generators
Cons
  • ORM functionality is not included.
  • Authentication requires framework features or an authentication library.
  • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage their hosting environment.
  • Focused on building applications in Go
  • Uses a Webpack-based frontend asset pipeline
  • Not a hosted SaaS product for teams seeking managed application hosting
Our verdict

Next.js is an open-source, full-stack React framework for interactive web applications. It suits solo developers and teams across small, mid-market, and enterprise organizations that need project structure for routing, data fetching,…

Read the review →

Buffalo is an open-source web development ecosystem for building web applications in Go. Its CLI helps create, build, run, and test applications, while the framework supports both server-rendered projects and API-only services. It is aimed…

Read the review →
  1. Next.jsWeb Frameworks 9.0Free plan
  2. BuffaloWeb Frameworks 7.6Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Next.js — where it wins

    • Hybrid rendering combines server rendering, static generation, and static export.
    • Route Handlers support backend endpoints within the application.
    • Built-in image optimization and TypeScript configuration support included.

    Where it doesn't

    • ORM functionality is not included.
    • Authentication requires framework features or an authentication library.
    • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage their hosting environment.

  • Buffalo — where it wins

    • Combines routing, middleware, sessions, cookies, and error handling
    • Includes Plush templates, Webpack asset handling, and hot code reloading
    • Provides Pop database tooling, background workers, and application generators

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on building applications in Go
    • Uses a Webpack-based frontend asset pipeline
    • Not a hosted SaaS product for teams seeking managed application hosting

More comparisons

All web frameworks comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update