Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Game Latency Reducers

Mudfish vs WTFast

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
WTFast #8 in Game Latency Reducers 8.3/10 3-day trial Free trial Visit WTFast

Mudfish leads on 0 checks, WTFast on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMudfish · 9.4/10
  • Free trialonly WTFast

Mudfish scores higher on our rubric for game latency reducers: 9.4 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #8.

On traffic routing, Mudfish gives you Both where WTFast offers Game-only.

Mudfish is the better fit for power users seeking maximum value. WTFast is the better fit for PC gamers valuing established coverage.

  • Mudfish fits best

    Power users seeking maximum value

  • WTFast fits best

    PC gamers valuing established coverage

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Mudfish 9.4/10 Visit ↗ WTFast 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 8.3
Ranking #1 in Game Latency Reducers #8 in Game Latency Reducers
Best for Power users seeking maximum value PC gamers valuing established coverage
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price 990 KRW/mo —
Free plan — —
Free trial — 3 days
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop, Mobile, Browser extension Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Chrome extension Windows
Support Email, Community, Docs Live chat, Tickets, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Specs
Supported platforms Windows, macOS, Linux, SteamOS/Steam Deck, Android, iOS, Chrome-compatible browsers, OpenWRT Windows; compatible gaming routers; consoles via routers
Traffic routing Both Game-only
Server selection Both Both
Simultaneous devices 1 1
Game profiles Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported protocols TCP, UDP, UDP FEC, UDP Simple FEC Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Selective or full-device routing across games, websites, or all traffic
  • Manual nodes, RTT-based recommendations, and multi-path routing
  • Broad support including Steam Deck, OpenWRT, mobile, and proxies
  • Supports more than 1,000 PC games automatically
  • Offers automatic and manual server selection
  • Works with compatible routers for console traffic
Cons
  • No free plan for trying the service before payment
  • Advanced routing options may require more configuration than simpler tools
  • Simultaneous-device support is limited to 1 device
  • No free plan
  • Supports one simultaneous device
  • Windows client coverage is narrower than router-based setups
Our verdict

Mudfish is a game-focused network optimization and VPN service for players who want to route game, website, or full-device traffic through dedicated nodes. It supports selective routing for chosen items and Full VPN mode for all device…

Read the review →

WTFast routes supported game traffic through its Gamers Private Network to address latency, jitter, and packet-loss issues. It is aimed at online PC gamers who want automatic route selection, manual server control, or both. The Windows…

Read the review →
  1. MudfishGame Latency Reducers 9.4Paid
  2. WTFastGame Latency Reducers 8.33-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Mudfish — where it wins

    • Selective or full-device routing across games, websites, or all traffic
    • Manual nodes, RTT-based recommendations, and multi-path routing
    • Broad support including Steam Deck, OpenWRT, mobile, and proxies

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan for trying the service before payment
    • Advanced routing options may require more configuration than simpler tools
    • Simultaneous-device support is limited to 1 device
  • WTFast — where it wins

    • Supports more than 1,000 PC games automatically
    • Offers automatic and manual server selection
    • Works with compatible routers for console traffic

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan
    • Supports one simultaneous device
    • Windows client coverage is narrower than router-based setups

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update