Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Plastic Surgery Software

ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery vs HARRIS CareTracker

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 8 checks side by side
Higher score ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery #2 in Plastic Surgery Software 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 7 of 7 features Contact ModMed
HARRIS CareTracker #7 in Plastic Surgery Software 8.5/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 7 features Visit site

ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery leads on 0 checks, HARRIS CareTracker on 0, and 8 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 8 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreModMed EMA Plastic Surgery · 9.0/10
  • Most featuresModMed EMA Plastic Surgery · 7 of 7

ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery scores higher on our rubric for plastic surgery software: 9.0 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #7.

ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery is the better fit for plastic surgeons wanting a specialty EHR. HARRIS CareTracker is the better fit for practices prioritizing claims and interoperability.

  • ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery fits best

    Plastic surgeons wanting a specialty EHR

  • HARRIS CareTracker fits best

    Practices prioritizing claims and interoperability

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery 9.0/10 Visit ↗ HARRIS CareTracker 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.5
Ranking #2 in Plastic Surgery Software #7 in Plastic Surgery Software
Best for Plastic surgeons wanting a specialty EHR Practices prioritizing claims and interoperability
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, iOS Web, Windows
Support Phone, Email, Tickets, Community, Docs Email, Phone, Live chat
Integrations 4 integrations 600+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery 7/7 · HARRIS CareTracker 5/7
Photo management ✓ ✓
Surgical planning ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Digital consent forms ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Online appointment booking ✓ ✓
Patient portal ✓ ✓
Billing and claims ✓ ✓
E-prescribing ✓ ✓
Our review
Pros
  • Adaptive plastic-surgery templates with suggested coding
  • Photo tagging, chart attachment and annotation support image workflows
  • Digital consents, prescribing, billing, quotes and inventory in one suite
  • Keeps before-and-after photos and consultation quotes in the clinical workflow
  • Connects documentation with eligibility, claims, denials and payment posting
  • Offers a patient portal, online appointment requests and a FHIR API
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales rather than comparing published rates
  • Online booking scope may depend on the broader suite
  • Not a fit for practices seeking a free plan
  • Pricing is contract-based, with annual subscription fees
  • E-prescribing connectivity may carry a monthly per-provider fee
  • No plastic-surgery-specific planning features are listed
Our verdict

Plastic surgeons handling cosmetic, reconstructive or aesthetic care can use ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery for clinical documentation and related practice workflows. The cloud-based system supports web and iOS, with an iPad-oriented EMA app.…

Read the review →

HARRIS CareTracker combines cloud-based EHR, practice management and billing for independent medical practices and billing organizations. Its plastic-surgery offering is aimed at cosmetic and reconstructive practices that want patient…

Read the review →
  1. ModMed EMA Plastic SurgeryPlastic Surgery Software 9.0Pricing on request
  2. HARRIS CareTrackerPlastic Surgery Software 8.5Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery — where it wins

    • Adaptive plastic-surgery templates with suggested coding
    • Photo tagging, chart attachment and annotation support image workflows
    • Digital consents, prescribing, billing, quotes and inventory in one suite

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales rather than comparing published rates
    • Online booking scope may depend on the broader suite
    • Not a fit for practices seeking a free plan
  • HARRIS CareTracker — where it wins

    • Keeps before-and-after photos and consultation quotes in the clinical workflow
    • Connects documentation with eligibility, claims, denials and payment posting
    • Offers a patient portal, online appointment requests and a FHIR API

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is contract-based, with annual subscription fees
    • E-prescribing connectivity may carry a monthly per-provider fee
    • No plastic-surgery-specific planning features are listed
  • ModMed EMA Plastic Surgery9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    Specialty documentation, photography and practice tools in a cloud-based EHR.

    Contact ModMedFull verdict →
  • HARRIS CareTracker8.5/10 · Pricing on request

    A cloud EHR pairing plastic-surgery photo and quote workflows with claims and interoperability.

    Visit siteFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update