Head-to-head · Game Databases
MobyGames vs GameDNA
MobyGames leads on 1 check, GameDNA on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreMobyGames · 9.4/10
- Free planonly MobyGames
- Free trialonly MobyGames
MobyGames scores higher on our rubric for game databases: 9.4 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #7.
MobyGames offers free plan; GameDNA doesn't.
MobyGames is the better fit for broad game research with API and exports. GameDNA is the better fit for commercial game metadata pipelines.
- MobyGames fits best
Broad game research with API and exports
- GameDNA fits best
Commercial game metadata pipelines
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | MobyGames 9.4/10 Visit ↗ | GameDNA 7.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.4 | 7.9 |
| Ranking | #1 in Game Databases | #7 in Game Databases |
| Best for | Broad game research with API and exports | Commercial game metadata pipelines |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Paid |
| Starting price | — | — |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | — |
| Free trial | 45 days | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Support | Docs | |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features MobyGames 1/5 · GameDNA 1/5 | ||
| API access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Quest data | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Character data | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Item data | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Ability data | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Supported platforms | Computer, console, arcade | arcade, console, PC |
| Export formats | CSV, JSON | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | MobyGames is a public video game database covering computer, console, and arcade titles. It combines searchable game records with release information, platform-specific specifications, developers, publishers, companies, credits, cover art,… Read the review → |
GameDNA is Gamacy’s commercial database of video game metadata, covering releases from 1971 to today. It is designed for storefronts, marketplaces, game developers, publishers, AI teams, researchers, and archivists that need structured… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
MobyGames — where it wins
- Covers computer, console, and arcade games
- Includes credits, media, releases, and platform records
- Offers REST API access plus CSV and JSON exports
Where it doesn't
- API access is limited to dedicated API tiers
- Professional adds career-network features beyond research
- Exports focus on game lists rather than every record type
GameDNA — where it wins
- Structured metadata spanning arcade, console, and PC releases
- Premium adds identifiers, pricing, and marketplace mappings
- Corpus provides validated records for AI model use
Where it doesn't
- Quote-based pricing requires a sales conversation
- API-only delivery may not suit non-technical teams
- Telemetry is not part of the active plans
- MobyGames9.4/10 · Free plan · 45-day trial
A broad game catalog with platform records, research tools, exports, and API access.
Visit MobyGamesFull verdict → - GameDNA7.9/10 · Pricing on request
A structured, API-delivered game database for commercial metadata workflows.
Visit GameDNAFull verdict →
More comparisons
- MobyGames vs RAWG
- MobyGames vs IGDB
- MobyGames vs LaunchBox
- MobyGames vs BoardGameGeek
- MobyGames vs NostalgiaDB
- MobyGames vs Interactive Fiction Database
- RAWG vs GameDNA
- IGDB vs GameDNA
All game databases comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





