Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Robotic Process Automation - Enterprise Software

Microsoft Power Automate vs Tungsten RPA

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Microsoft Power Automate #1 in Robotic Process Automation - Enterprise Software 9.2/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Microsoft

Microsoft Power Automate leads on 0 checks, Tungsten RPA on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMicrosoft Power Automate · 9.2/10
  • Free planonly Microsoft Power Automate
  • Free trialonly Microsoft Power Automate

Microsoft Power Automate scores higher on our rubric for robotic process automation - enterprise software: 9.2 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #8.

Microsoft Power Automate is the better fit for microsoft-centric teams wanting affordable RPA. Tungsten RPA is the better fit for teams prioritizing document processing and bot operations.

  • Microsoft Power Automate fits best

    Microsoft-centric teams wanting affordable RPA

  • Tungsten RPA fits best

    Teams prioritizing document processing and bot operations

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Microsoft Power Automate 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Tungsten RPA 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.2
Ranking #1 in Robotic Process Automation - Enterprise Software #8 in Robotic Process Automation - Enterprise Software
Best for Microsoft-centric teams wanting affordable RPA Teams prioritizing document processing and bot operations
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $15/user/mo Pricing on request
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Cloud, Desktop Desktop
Platforms Web, Windows Windows, Linux
Features Microsoft Power Automate 0/3 · Tungsten RPA 0/3
Process discovery Not checked yet Not checked yet
Credential vault Not checked yet Not checked yet
Audit logs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment options Not checked yet Not checked yet
Bot execution modes Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported desktop OS Not checked yet cross-platform
Our review
Pros
  • Combines cloud workflows with Windows desktop RPA and mining
  • $15-per-user Premium plan includes attended desktop flows and connectors
  • Integrates with Microsoft 365, Salesforce, SAP, and custom APIs
  • Low-code design supports multi-step desktop, web, and legacy workflows.
  • Intelligent document processing adds classification to bot workflows.
  • Central management, analytics, and Git lifecycle tools support bot operations.
Cons
  • Desktop robotic process automation targets Windows applications
  • Unattended automation plans are priced per bot rather than per user
  • Standalone iOS and Android app support ended August 31, 2026
  • Buyers must engage sales to discuss pricing and plans.
  • Hybrid deployments can require coordination across cloud and on-premises environments.
  • Rule-based focus may not fit unstructured or judgment-heavy work.
Our verdict

Microsoft Power Automate is a low-code platform for automating cloud workflows, Windows desktop tasks, approvals, and broader business processes. It suits mid-market and enterprise teams that need to connect Microsoft 365 services, cloud…

Read the review →

Tungsten RPA automates repetitive, rule-based work across desktop applications, websites, legacy systems, and enterprise technologies. Its low-code robot design environment is aimed at organizations that need both attended desktop…

Read the review →
  1. Microsoft Power AutomateRobotic Process Automation - Enterprise Software 9.2Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. Tungsten RPARobotic Process Automation - Enterprise Software 8.2Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Microsoft Power Automate — where it wins

    • Combines cloud workflows with Windows desktop RPA and mining
    • $15-per-user Premium plan includes attended desktop flows and connectors
    • Integrates with Microsoft 365, Salesforce, SAP, and custom APIs

    Where it doesn't

    • Desktop robotic process automation targets Windows applications
    • Unattended automation plans are priced per bot rather than per user
    • Standalone iOS and Android app support ended August 31, 2026
  • Tungsten RPA — where it wins

    • Low-code design supports multi-step desktop, web, and legacy workflows.
    • Intelligent document processing adds classification to bot workflows.
    • Central management, analytics, and Git lifecycle tools support bot operations.

    Where it doesn't

    • Buyers must engage sales to discuss pricing and plans.
    • Hybrid deployments can require coordination across cloud and on-premises environments.
    • Rule-based focus may not fit unstructured or judgment-heavy work.
  • Microsoft Power Automate9.2/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    Affordable Microsoft-focused RPA with cloud workflows, desktop automation, mining, and governance.

    Visit MicrosoftFull verdict →
  • Tungsten RPA8.2/10 · Pricing on request

    A cross-platform RPA suite combining document processing, bot operations, and orchestration.

    Visit Tungsten RPAFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update