This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them

Period

–Visits

–Page views

–Clicks to vendors

–Time on page

–Reading now

Clicks to vendors, by tool

Top countries

Devices

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Offensive Security

Metasploit vs Core Impact

Updated Oct 2026
Both researched from official sources
3 checks side by side

Higher score Metasploit #5 in Offensive Security 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Rapid7

Core Impact #7 in Offensive Security 8.7/10 Paid ✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Core Impact

Metasploit leads on 1 check, Core Impact on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

Highest scoreMetasploit · 8.9/10
Free planonly Metasploit
Most featuresCore Impact · 2 of 2

Metasploit scores higher on our rubric for offensive security: 8.9 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

Metasploit offers free plan; Core Impact doesn't.

Metasploit is the better fit for practitioners needing free exploit and post-exploit tools. Core Impact is the better fit for teams needing mature, automated network assessments.

Metasploit fits best
Practitioners needing free exploit and post-exploit tools
Core Impact fits best
Teams needing mature, automated network assessments

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Show only differences

Feature	Metasploit 8.9/10 Visit ↗	Core Impact 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.9	8.7
Ranking	#5 in Offensive Security	#7 in Offensive Security
Best for	Practitioners needing free exploit and post-exploit tools	Teams needing mature, automated network assessments
Pricing model	Free plan + paid	Paid
Starting price	Free plan	—
Free plan	✓ (best)	—
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Self-hosted	Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms	Linux, macOS	Windows
Support	Community	Email, Live chat, Phone
Integrations	2 integrations	20+ integrations
Built for	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Metasploit 0/2 · Core Impact 2/2
Automated attacks	Not checked yet	✓ (best)
Attack simulation library	Not checked yet	✓ (best)
Specs
Deployment	Not checked yet	Self-hosted
Testing scope	Not checked yet	External
Listed integrations	Not checked yet	20
Our review
Pros	Free Framework includes reconnaissance, exploit, payload and post-exploitation modules Supports network and web application testing in a self-hosted setup Metasploit Pro adds evidence collection, reports and credential management	Certified exploit library with rapid penetration test automation Multi-vector testing, phishing and ransomware simulation 20 integrations plus automated reporting and remediation validation
Cons	Framework is installed locally and is available for Linux and macOS Community support is the listed support channel Advanced assessment workflow features are part of the commercial edition	Windows-only platform limits operating-system flexibility No free plan; licensing is paid across Basic, Pro and Enterprise Self-hosted desktop deployment requires local installation and management
Our verdict	Metasploit is a penetration testing framework maintained by the open-source community and Rapid7. Its free Metasploit Framework is aimed at security practitioners and teams that need tools to gather information, test known vulnerabilities,… Read the review →	Core Impact is Fortra’s penetration-testing platform for security teams running guided or advanced assessments. It combines Rapid Penetration Tests, a commercial library of certified exploits, and testing across networks, endpoints and web… Read the review →

MetasploitOffensive Security 8.9Free plan
C Core ImpactOffensive Security 8.7Paid

Compare the top tools in

Strengths and trade-offs

Metasploit — where it wins
- Free Framework includes reconnaissance, exploit, payload and post-exploitation modules
- Supports network and web application testing in a self-hosted setup
- Metasploit Pro adds evidence collection, reports and credential management
Where it doesn't
- Framework is installed locally and is available for Linux and macOS
- Community support is the listed support channel
- Advanced assessment workflow features are part of the commercial edition
Core Impact — where it wins
- Certified exploit library with rapid penetration test automation
- Multi-vector testing, phishing and ransomware simulation
- 20 integrations plus automated reporting and remediation validation
Where it doesn't
- Windows-only platform limits operating-system flexibility
- No free plan; licensing is paid across Basic, Pro and Enterprise
- Self-hosted desktop deployment requires local installation and management

Metasploit8.9/10 · Free plan
Free, open-source testing tools with paid capabilities for guided assessments and reporting.
Visit Rapid7 Full verdict →
Core Impact8.7/10 · Paid
A Windows-based platform for automated, multi-vector penetration testing and validation.
Visit Core Impact Full verdict →

More comparisons

All offensive security comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated 7 Oct 2026 · How we research and update