Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Freight Software

Manhattan Active Transportation Management vs e2open Transportation Management

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Manhattan Active Transportation Management #5 in Freight Software 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 5 features Visit site
e2open Transportation Management #6 in Freight Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 5 features Contact e2open

Manhattan Active Transportation Management leads on 0 checks, e2open Transportation Management on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreManhattan Active Transportation Management · 8.8/10
  • Most featuresManhattan Active Transportation Management · 1 of 5

Manhattan Active Transportation Management scores higher on our rubric for freight software: 8.8 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #6.

Manhattan Active Transportation Management is the better fit for mid-market and enterprise multimodal transportation teams. e2open Transportation Management is the better fit for enterprises needing network-based multimodal TMS.

  • Manhattan Active Transportation Management fits best

    Mid-market and enterprise multimodal transportation teams

  • e2open Transportation Management fits best

    Enterprises needing network-based multimodal TMS

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Manhattan Active Transportation Management 8.8/10 Visit ↗ e2open Transportation Management 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.7
Ranking #5 in Freight Software #6 in Freight Software
Best for Mid-market and enterprise multimodal transportation teams Enterprises needing network-based multimodal TMS
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Support Docs Email, Phone, Tickets
Compliance SOC 2, GDPR, PCI DSS SOC 2, ISO 27001
Integrations 3 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Manhattan Active Transportation Management 1/5 · e2open Transportation Management 0/5
Dispatch planning Not checked yet Not checked yet
Shipment tracking ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Carrier portal Not checked yet Not checked yet
EDI support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Mobile app Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Freight modes Not checked yet multimodal
Our review
Pros
  • Covers shipment creation, carrier selection, tendering, tracking and settlement
  • Supports truckload, LTL, intermodal, parcel, ocean, air and rail
  • API-first extensibility plus web and mobile access
  • Covers planning, tendering, booking, tracking, audit, payment, and settlement
  • Supports road, ocean, rail, air, and parcel transportation
  • Connects ERP, WMS, EDI, APIs, and digital freight brokers
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Broad scope may exceed the needs of teams with simple freight workflows
  • Support channels listed are limited to documentation
  • Pricing requires contact with sales
  • Cloud deployment is the available deployment model
  • Designed for mid-market and enterprise operations rather than small teams
Our verdict

Manhattan Active Transportation Management is a cloud transportation management system for mid-market and enterprise teams managing domestic and global freight networks. It brings transportation orders and shipments, carrier and rate…

Read the review →

e2open Transportation Management is a cloud-based transportation management system for shippers, carriers, and logistics providers. It spans transportation planning and optimization, carrier procurement and load tendering, shipment booking…

Read the review →
  1. Manhattan Active Transportation ManagementFreight Software 8.8Pricing on request
  2. e2open Transportation ManagementFreight Software 8.7Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Manhattan Active Transportation Management — where it wins

    • Covers shipment creation, carrier selection, tendering, tracking and settlement
    • Supports truckload, LTL, intermodal, parcel, ocean, air and rail
    • API-first extensibility plus web and mobile access

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Broad scope may exceed the needs of teams with simple freight workflows
    • Support channels listed are limited to documentation
  • e2open Transportation Management — where it wins

    • Covers planning, tendering, booking, tracking, audit, payment, and settlement
    • Supports road, ocean, rail, air, and parcel transportation
    • Connects ERP, WMS, EDI, APIs, and digital freight brokers

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contact with sales
    • Cloud deployment is the available deployment model
    • Designed for mid-market and enterprise operations rather than small teams
  • Manhattan Active Transportation Management8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad cloud TMS for teams coordinating multimodal freight from planning through settlement.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • e2open Transportation Management8.7/10 · Pricing on request

    A cloud TMS for complex multimodal networks, with planning through settlement in one platform.

    Contact e2openFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update