Keycloak vs PingOne

Keycloak9.0Visit PingOne8.2Visit

Higher score Keycloak #3 in Authentication Software 9.0/10 Open source ✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Keycloak

vs

PingOne #8 in Authentication Software 8.2/10 30-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 2 features Visit PingOne

• Keycloak fits best

  Teams wanting self-hosted, open-source identity

• PingOne fits best

  Workforces needing adaptive SSO and provisioning

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Keycloak 9.0/10 Visit ↗	PingOne 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.0	8.2
Ranking	#3 in Authentication Software	#8 in Authentication Software
Best for	Teams wanting self-hosted, open-source identity	Workforces needing adaptive SSO and provisioning
Pricing model	Free	Paid
Starting price	Open source	$3/user/mo
Free plan	Not checked yet	—
Free trial	—	30 days
Deployment	Cloud, Desktop, Self-hosted	Cloud
Platforms	Web, Windows, Linux	Web
Integrations	10 integrations	4 integrations
Features Keycloak 1/2 · PingOne 0/2
Passkey sign-in	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Directory sync	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Specs
Monthly active users	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Auth protocols	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
MFA methods	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Deployment	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0. Offers LDAP and Active Directory federation plus social login. Includes TOTP, HOTP, WebAuthn/passkeys, and authorization policies.	Supports SAML, OIDC, OAuth 2.0, and SCIM provisioning Adds adaptive MFA, passwordless authentication, and risk-based access Connects Microsoft 365, Active Directory, LDAP, Kerberos, and RADIUS
Cons	Organizations must deploy and manage the server themselves. SCIM user and group management is a preview feature. SCIM is disabled by default.	Workforce pricing requires annual billing and a 5,000-user minimum Customer Passwordless pricing requires contacting sales Cloud-only deployment with email listed as the support channel
Our verdict	Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management server for teams securing web applications, REST services, and other applications. Its self-hosted approach suits organizations that want to manage identity infrastructure… Read the review →	PingOne is Ping Identity’s cloud identity platform for workforce and customer access. It combines single sign-on, directory services, an employee application portal, SaaS application access, and customer identity orchestration. Workforce… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Keycloak — where it wins

  • Supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0.
  • Offers LDAP and Active Directory federation plus social login.
  • Includes TOTP, HOTP, WebAuthn/passkeys, and authorization policies.

  Where it doesn't

  • Organizations must deploy and manage the server themselves.
  • SCIM user and group management is a preview feature.
  • SCIM is disabled by default.

• PingOne — where it wins

  • Supports SAML, OIDC, OAuth 2.0, and SCIM provisioning
  • Adds adaptive MFA, passwordless authentication, and risk-based access
  • Connects Microsoft 365, Active Directory, LDAP, Kerberos, and RADIUS

  Where it doesn't

  • Workforce pricing requires annual billing and a 5,000-user minimum
  • Customer Passwordless pricing requires contacting sales
  • Cloud-only deployment with email listed as the support channel

• Keycloak9.0/10 · Open source

  A self-hosted, open-source identity server with broad protocol and MFA support.

  Visit KeycloakFull verdict →
• PingOne8.2/10 · 30-day trial

  Adaptive SSO, MFA, passwordless access, and provisioning for workforce and customer identities.

  Visit PingOneFull verdict →