Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Orchestration / Provisioning Software

Juju vs Puppet

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Juju #6 in Orchestration / Provisioning Software 8.8/10 Open source ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Canonical
Puppet #8 in Orchestration / Provisioning Software 8.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Puppet

Juju leads on 0 checks, Puppet on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreJuju · 8.8/10
  • Free planonly Puppet

Juju scores higher on our rubric for orchestration / provisioning software: 8.8 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #8.

Juju is the better fit for teams orchestrating applications across hybrid clouds. Puppet is the better fit for enterprises enforcing configuration and compliance.

  • Juju fits best

    Teams orchestrating applications across hybrid clouds

  • Puppet fits best

    Enterprises enforcing configuration and compliance

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Juju 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Puppet 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.6
Ranking #6 in Orchestration / Provisioning Software #8 in Orchestration / Provisioning Software
Best for Teams orchestrating applications across hybrid clouds Enterprises enforcing configuration and compliance
Pricing model Free Free plan + paid
Starting price Open source —
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Docs
Integrations 3 integrations 11 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Enterprise
Features Juju 0/2 · Puppet 0/2
Role-based access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Audit logs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Self_hosted Self_hosted
Supported platforms Not checked yet Debian, Fedora, macOS, Microsoft Windows, Windows Server, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Amazon Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, Alma Linux, Rocky Linux, Oracle Linux, Ubuntu
Provisioning method Not checked yet Not checked yet
Automation runs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Reusable charms package deployment and application operating logic
  • Manages Kubernetes, VMs, containers, bare metal, and cloud targets
  • Connects with Charmhub, Terraform, and cross-model relations
  • Detects and remediates configuration drift automatically
  • Supports patch workflows and policy-as-code compliance reporting
  • Offers both agent-based and agentless automation
Cons
  • Self-hosted operations include controllers, models, users, and permissions
  • Support is provided through community channels and documentation
  • Broad target coverage requires choosing and managing suitable charms
  • Commercial plans require contacting sales for pricing
  • The free Developer plan is limited to fewer than 25 nodes
  • Its focus is configuration management, not broad cloud provisioning
Our verdict

Juju is an open-source orchestration engine from Canonical for teams deploying and operating applications across hybrid clouds. It provisions infrastructure through supported providers and manages workloads on Kubernetes clusters, virtual…

Read the review →

Puppet helps infrastructure and platform teams define desired system state as code, apply configurations, and keep servers aligned over time. Its fit is strongest for enterprises that need configuration enforcement and compliance workflows…

Read the review →
  1. JujuOrchestration / Provisioning Software 8.8Open source
  2. PuppetOrchestration / Provisioning Software 8.6Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Juju — where it wins

    • Reusable charms package deployment and application operating logic
    • Manages Kubernetes, VMs, containers, bare metal, and cloud targets
    • Connects with Charmhub, Terraform, and cross-model relations

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted operations include controllers, models, users, and permissions
    • Support is provided through community channels and documentation
    • Broad target coverage requires choosing and managing suitable charms
  • Puppet — where it wins

    • Detects and remediates configuration drift automatically
    • Supports patch workflows and policy-as-code compliance reporting
    • Offers both agent-based and agentless automation

    Where it doesn't

    • Commercial plans require contacting sales for pricing
    • The free Developer plan is limited to fewer than 25 nodes
    • Its focus is configuration management, not broad cloud provisioning
  • Juju8.8/10 · Open source

    Juju coordinates hybrid-cloud workloads with charms, integrations, and lifecycle operations.

    Visit CanonicalFull verdict →
  • Puppet8.6/10 · Free plan

    Puppet enforces desired system state, corrects drift, and supports compliance across infrastructure.

    Visit PuppetFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update