Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Conflict Checking Software

iManage Conflicts & Intake vs Kingland Conflict Checking

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
iManage Conflicts & Intake #2 in Conflict Checking Software 7.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit iManage
Kingland Conflict Checking #5 in Conflict Checking Software 7.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 4 features Contact Kingland

iManage Conflicts & Intake leads on 0 checks, Kingland Conflict Checking on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Most featuresKingland Conflict Checking · 1 of 4

iManage Conflicts & Intake and Kingland Conflict Checking score identically on our rubric (7.9 out of 10) for conflict checking software; iManage Conflicts & Intake sits at #2 and Kingland Conflict Checking at #5 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

iManage Conflicts & Intake is the better fit for firms combining conflict checks with intake workflows. Kingland Conflict Checking is the better fit for enterprises needing rules-based conflict clearance.

  • iManage Conflicts & Intake fits best

    Firms combining conflict checks with intake workflows

  • Kingland Conflict Checking fits best

    Enterprises needing rules-based conflict clearance

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature iManage Conflicts & Intake 7.9/10 Visit ↗ Kingland Conflict Checking 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.9
Ranking #2 in Conflict Checking Software #5 in Conflict Checking Software
Best for Firms combining conflict checks with intake workflows Enterprises needing rules-based conflict clearance
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Community, Docs · 24/7 Email, Phone
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Enterprise
Features iManage Conflicts & Intake 0/4 · Kingland Conflict Checking 1/4
Ethical walls Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Audit log Not checked yet Not checked yet
Bulk conflict checks Not checked yet Not checked yet
API access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Conflict search scope Not checked yet Firm-wide
Included matter limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Included user limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Finds organizational relationships across siloed data
  • Records interactive clearance and resolution decisions
  • Connects conflict checks with configurable intake workflows
  • Centralizes checks around integrated entity and relationship data
  • Routes higher-risk cases for review while expediting lower-risk cases
  • Documents disclosure, consent, team separation, and approval conditions
Cons
  • Pricing requires a sales conversation
  • Its workflow and document features center on the iManage ecosystem
  • The cloud product is listed for web access only
  • Pricing is discussed through vendor contact rather than published plans
  • Cloud deployment is the only listed platform option
  • Technical user- or team-level matter access restrictions are unspecified
Our verdict

For law firms and other professional-services organizations, iManage Conflicts & Intake brings client onboarding and risk review into one cloud product. Its conflict search supports synonym creation and can surface organizational…

Read the review →

When a firm is considering new client services, Kingland Conflict Checking brings conflict evaluation into a centralized workflow. It is designed for enterprise firms managing complex networks and high volumes of checks, where firm-wide…

Read the review →
  1. iManage Conflicts & IntakeConflict Checking Software 7.9Pricing on request
  2. Kingland Conflict CheckingConflict Checking Software 7.9Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • iManage Conflicts & Intake — where it wins

    • Finds organizational relationships across siloed data
    • Records interactive clearance and resolution decisions
    • Connects conflict checks with configurable intake workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a sales conversation
    • Its workflow and document features center on the iManage ecosystem
    • The cloud product is listed for web access only
  • Kingland Conflict Checking — where it wins

    • Centralizes checks around integrated entity and relationship data
    • Routes higher-risk cases for review while expediting lower-risk cases
    • Documents disclosure, consent, team separation, and approval conditions

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is discussed through vendor contact rather than published plans
    • Cloud deployment is the only listed platform option
    • Technical user- or team-level matter access restrictions are unspecified
  • iManage Conflicts & Intake7.9/10 · Pricing on request

    Combines conflict review and configurable intake workflows with relationship discovery and clearance auditing.

    Visit iManageFull verdict →
  • Kingland Conflict Checking7.9/10 · Pricing on request

    Rules-based conflict workflows with dynamic risk assessment and review routing.

    Contact KinglandFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update