Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Strategic Portfolio Management

IBM Targetprocess vs Planview Portfolios

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score IBM Targetprocess #4 in Strategic Portfolio Management 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 6 features Visit IBM
Planview Portfolios #5 in Strategic Portfolio Management 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 6 features Visit Planview

IBM Targetprocess leads on 0 checks, Planview Portfolios on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreIBM Targetprocess · 8.8/10
  • Most featuresPlanview Portfolios · 1 of 6

IBM Targetprocess scores higher on our rubric for strategic portfolio management: 8.8 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.

IBM Targetprocess is the better fit for mid-market and enterprise Agile portfolios. Planview Portfolios is the better fit for enterprises coordinating strategic portfolios.

  • IBM Targetprocess fits best

    Mid-market and enterprise Agile portfolios

  • Planview Portfolios fits best

    Enterprises coordinating strategic portfolios

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature IBM Targetprocess 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Planview Portfolios 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.7
Ranking #4 in Strategic Portfolio Management #5 in Strategic Portfolio Management
Best for Mid-market and enterprise Agile portfolios Enterprises coordinating strategic portfolios
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Community, Docs · 24/7 Tickets, Community, Docs
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Enterprise, Mid-market
Features IBM Targetprocess 0/6 · Planview Portfolios 1/6
Strategic alignment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Scenario analysis Not checked yet Not checked yet
Capacity planning Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Financial planning Not checked yet Not checked yet
Roadmap views Not checked yet Not checked yet
Idea and demand intake Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Hosting Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Links portfolio, program, and team roadmaps with dependency tracking
  • Combines capacity management with budgeting and forecasting
  • Supports configurable Agile and SAFe processes, traceability, and testing
  • Combines prioritization, demand intake, and scenario planning.
  • Connects capacity planning with budgets, actuals, and forecasts.
  • Maps cross-project dependencies alongside roadmaps and strategic alignment.
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Cloud deployment only
  • Its listed capabilities give less emphasis to intake and scenario planning
  • Pricing is sales-led rather than publicly listed.
  • Listed integrations are limited to Jira, Azure DevOps, and AgilePlace.
  • Web and cloud deployment may not suit teams needing other platform options.
Our verdict

IBM Targetprocess is a cloud-based strategic portfolio and work management platform for mid-market and enterprise organizations coordinating portfolios, programs, investments, resources, and delivery teams. It is aimed at organizations…

Read the review →

Planview Portfolios brings strategic portfolio and project management into one platform for PMOs, EPMOs, executives, finance teams, and technology leaders. It is aimed at mature mid-market and enterprise organizations coordinating…

Read the review →
  1. IBM TargetprocessStrategic Portfolio Management 8.8Pricing on request
  2. Planview PortfoliosStrategic Portfolio Management 8.7Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • IBM Targetprocess — where it wins

    • Links portfolio, program, and team roadmaps with dependency tracking
    • Combines capacity management with budgeting and forecasting
    • Supports configurable Agile and SAFe processes, traceability, and testing

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Cloud deployment only
    • Its listed capabilities give less emphasis to intake and scenario planning

  • Planview Portfolios — where it wins

    • Combines prioritization, demand intake, and scenario planning.
    • Connects capacity planning with budgets, actuals, and forecasts.
    • Maps cross-project dependencies alongside roadmaps and strategic alignment.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is sales-led rather than publicly listed.
    • Listed integrations are limited to Jira, Azure DevOps, and AgilePlace.
    • Web and cloud deployment may not suit teams needing other platform options.
  • IBM Targetprocess8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    Connects portfolio strategy with roadmaps, delivery, resources, and financial planning.

    Visit IBMFull verdict →
  • Planview Portfolios8.7/10 · Pricing on request

    Connects portfolio strategy, demand, delivery, resources, and financial tracking.

    Visit PlanviewFull verdict →

More comparisons

All strategic portfolio management comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update