Head-to-head · Third Party & Supplier Risk Management Software
IBM OpenPages vs SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management
IBM OpenPages leads on 0 checks, SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreIBM OpenPages · 9.0/10
- Free planonly SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management
- Free trialonly SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management
- Most featuresSecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management · 2 of 4
IBM OpenPages scores higher on our rubric for third party & supplier risk management software: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #4.
SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management offers free plan; IBM OpenPages doesn't.
IBM OpenPages is the better fit for organizations standardizing third-party risk within GRC. SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management is the better fit for teams wanting a free entry point for security risk.
- IBM OpenPages fits best
Organizations standardizing third-party risk within GRC
- SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management fits best
Teams wanting a free entry point for security risk
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | IBM OpenPages 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management 8.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Ranking | #2 in Third Party & Supplier Risk Management Software | #4 in Third Party & Supplier Risk Management Software |
| Best for | Organizations standardizing third-party risk within GRC | Teams wanting a free entry point for security risk |
| Pricing model | Paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | $3,300/mo | — |
| Free plan | — | ✓ (best) |
| Free trial | — | 14 days |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Phone | Tickets, Docs, Phone |
| Integrations | 8 integrations | 12 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features IBM OpenPages 0/4 · SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management 2/4 | ||
| Continuous monitoring | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Fourth-party risk | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Workflow automation | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Contract tracking | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Vendor limit | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Deployment | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Risk methodology | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | IBM OpenPages brings third-party vendor risk assessments and questionnaires into a broader governance, risk and compliance platform. It is suited to organizations that want vendor risk managed alongside regulatory compliance, operational… Read the review → |
SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management is a cloud platform for security, risk, compliance, and procurement teams assessing vendor and supply-chain exposure. It combines security ratings, continuous third- and fourth-party… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
IBM OpenPages — where it wins
- Connects vendor assessments and questionnaires with wider GRC workflows
- Maps regulatory requirements to risks, controls and policies
- Offers AWS SaaS, IBM Cloud hosting and on-premises deployment
Where it doesn't
- Essentials starts at $3,300 per month
- Third-party risk is one part of a broader GRC suite
- On-premises installation is maintained by the client
SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management — where it wins
- Free accounts include domain ratings, open issues, and a self-monitoring dashboard.
- Premium adds third- and fourth-party discovery and custom questionnaires.
- Integrations connect risk workflows with tools such as ServiceNow, Jira, and Slack.
Where it doesn't
- Free accounts focus on monitoring your own domain, not monitored organizations.
- Core, Premium, and Elite pricing is provided through sales.
- Advanced capabilities such as framework mapping sit in higher paid tiers.
- IBM OpenPages9.0/10 · Paid
A broad GRC suite for organizations bringing vendor risk into shared controls and workflows.
Visit IBM OpenPagesFull verdict → - SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management8.8/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial
A security-focused vendor risk platform with a free self-monitoring entry point.
Visit siteFull verdict →
More comparisons
- OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management vs IBM OpenPages
- OneTrust Third-Party Risk Management vs SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management
- IBM OpenPages vs Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management
- IBM OpenPages vs UpGuard
- IBM OpenPages vs ProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Management
- IBM OpenPages vs Venminder
- IBM OpenPages vs Panorays
- SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management vs Venminder
All third party & supplier risk management software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update







