Head-to-head · Website Accessibility Tools
GetWCAG vs AccessibilityChecker.org
GetWCAG leads on 2 checks, AccessibilityChecker.org on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreGetWCAG · 6.8/10
- Lowest starting priceGetWCAG · $19/mo
- Most featuresAccessibilityChecker.org · 4 of 4
GetWCAG scores higher on our rubric for website accessibility tools: 6.8 against 6.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #9 and #15.
GetWCAG is cheaper to start at $19/mo against $69/mo. GetWCAG leads on scan limit: 250 pages versus 25 pages. AccessibilityChecker.org offers api access; GetWCAG doesn't publish it.
GetWCAG is the better fit for small sites needing flows and staging checks. AccessibilityChecker.org is the better fit for teams wanting guided fixes and monitoring.
- GetWCAG fits best
Small sites needing flows and staging checks
- AccessibilityChecker.org fits best
Teams wanting guided fixes and monitoring
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | GetWCAG 6.8/10 Visit ↗ | AccessibilityChecker.org 6.2/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 6.8 | 6.2 |
| Ranking | #9 in Website Accessibility Tools | #15 in Website Accessibility Tools |
| Best for | Small sites needing flows and staging checks | Teams wanting guided fixes and monitoring |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $19/mo (best) | $69/mo |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Browser extension | Cloud, Browser extension |
| Platforms | Web, Chrome extension | Web, Chrome extension |
| Compliance | SSO/SAML | GDPR, 2FA |
| Integrations | 5 integrations | 1 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features GetWCAG 3/4 · AccessibilityChecker.org 4/4 | ||
| Scheduled scans | ✓ | ✓ |
| Browser extension | ✓ | ✓ |
| CI/CD integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | Not published | ✓ (best) |
| Specs | ||
| WCAG version | Wcag 2.2 | Wcag 2.2 |
| Scan scope | Site | Site |
| Scan limit | 250 pages (best) | 25 pages |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | GetWCAG is a paid web accessibility platform for agencies, enterprises, municipalities, and other organizations that need recurring checks across websites and user flows. It scans full sites, selected URL sets, authenticated pages, and… Read the review → |
AccessibilityChecker.org is a web accessibility platform for businesses, agencies, and public-sector organizations. It crawls websites, lets teams select URLs, and scans for WCAG and best-practice issues. Results include failing-element… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
GetWCAG — where it wins
- Scans full websites, selected URLs, authenticated pages, and multi-step journeys
- Checks WCAG 2.1 and WCAG 2.2 with severity-based prioritization
- Connects with Jira, Slack, Teams, email, GitHub, CI/CD, and Chrome
Where it doesn't
- No free plan is available
- Basic limits scanning to 250 pages per month
- Centralized workspaces and shared quotas start on Business
AccessibilityChecker.org — where it wins
- Continuous monitoring, alerts, and unlimited paid-plan rescans
- WCAG mapping, failing-element details, and remediation guidance
- Chrome extension, AI-assisted fixes, reports, and API access
Where it doesn't
- Lite covers up to 25 URLs
- Paid plans start at $89 per domain per month
- Jira is the listed integration
- GetWCAG6.8/10 · From $19/mo
A paid accessibility platform combining site scans, journey checks, monitoring, and issue workflows.
Visit GetWCAGFull verdict → - AccessibilityChecker.org6.2/10 · From $69/mo (annual) · 7-day trial
Guided accessibility fixes and monitoring, with a high paid entry price.
Visit the websiteFull verdict →
All website accessibility tools comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update

