Head-to-head · Stock Vector Libraries
GetIllustrations vs Openclipart
GetIllustrations leads on 0 checks, Openclipart on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreGetIllustrations · 7.9/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresOpenclipart · 2 of 2
GetIllustrations scores higher on our rubric for stock vector libraries: 7.9 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #9.
Openclipart offers editorial license; GetIllustrations doesn't publish it.
GetIllustrations is the better fit for illustration libraries with deep integrations. Openclipart is the better fit for large free clipart collections.
- GetIllustrations fits best
Illustration libraries with deep integrations
- Openclipart fits best
Large free clipart collections
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | GetIllustrations 7.9/10 Visit ↗ | Openclipart 6.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.9 | 6.9 |
| Ranking | #4 in Stock Vector Libraries | #9 in Stock Vector Libraries |
| Best for | Illustration libraries with deep integrations | Large free clipart collections |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Browser extension | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Docs | Email, Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market | Solo, Small business |
| Features GetIllustrations 1/2 · Openclipart 2/2 | ||
| Commercial license | ✓ | ✓ |
| Editorial license | Not published | ✓ (best) |
| Specs | ||
| Asset types | illustrations, icons | clipart, icons |
| Vector formats | SVG, AI, EPS, Figma | SVG, PDF |
| Download limit | Not published | Not published |
| Included team seats | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | GetIllustrations is an online library of editable vector illustrations and icon packs for designers, developers, marketers, and creative teams. Its collection is searchable, and assets are available in formats including SVG, PNG, AI,… Read the review → |
Openclipart is a free online library of vector clipart and icons contributed by artists. It suits designers, educators, publishers, developers, and businesses looking for reusable graphics rather than a broad stock-media service. Visitors… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
GetIllustrations — where it wins
- Searchable illustrations and icons with broad source-file support
- Figma plugin, color editor, and integrations across major design tools
- Commercial licensing and unlimited downloads on access plans
Where it doesn't
- Free assets include low-resolution, watermarked PNG files
- Quarterly access uses a 1,800-credit limit
- API access is offered through a separate developer plan
Openclipart — where it wins
- Large searchable collection of clipart and icons
- SVG, PNG, and PDF downloads support varied workflows
- CC0/public-domain licensing supports commercial reuse
Where it doesn't
- Focused on clipart and icons rather than broader stock media
- Platform access is limited to the web and API
- Community features may add participation overhead for contributors
- GetIllustrations7.9/10 · Free plan
A flexible illustration library with strong formats, integrations, and API access.
Try GetIllustrationsFull verdict → - Openclipart6.9/10 · Free plan
A large, free clipart library with SVG, PNG, PDF, API, and community features.
Visit OpenclipartFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Vecteezy vs GetIllustrations
- Vecteezy vs Openclipart
- VectorStock vs GetIllustrations
- VectorStock vs Openclipart
- GetIllustrations vs Clker
- GetIllustrations vs DrawKit
- GetIllustrations vs Public Domain Vectors
- GetIllustrations vs Ouch! by Icons8
All stock vector libraries comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






