Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Radiology Software

Fujifilm Synapse PACS vs Epic Radiant

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Fujifilm Synapse PACS #3 in Radiology Software 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Fujifilm
Epic Radiant #6 in Radiology Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 5 features Contact Epic

Fujifilm Synapse PACS leads on 0 checks, Epic Radiant on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFujifilm Synapse PACS · 9.0/10
  • Most featuresEpic Radiant · 1 of 5

Fujifilm Synapse PACS scores higher on our rubric for radiology software: 9.0 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #6.

Fujifilm Synapse PACS is the better fit for multi-specialty imaging and remote reading. Epic Radiant is the better fit for healthcare organizations needing radiology workflows.

  • Fujifilm Synapse PACS fits best

    Multi-specialty imaging and remote reading

  • Epic Radiant fits best

    Healthcare organizations needing radiology workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Fujifilm Synapse PACS 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Epic Radiant 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.7
Ranking #3 in Radiology Software #6 in Radiology Software
Best for Multi-specialty imaging and remote reading Healthcare organizations needing radiology workflows
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Fujifilm Synapse PACS 0/5 · Epic Radiant 1/5
PACS included Not checked yet —
RIS included Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Diagnostic DICOM viewer Not checked yet Not checked yet
Modality worklist Not checked yet Not checked yet
Structured reporting Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • One viewer spans radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology, and specialty imaging
  • DICOM and non-DICOM access with zero-download web viewing
  • AI worklists support algorithm integration and study prioritization
  • Coordinates scheduling and exam workflows for technologists and nurses
  • Supports study prioritization, reporting, and follow-up procedure tracking
  • Dashboards show department and individual performance
Cons
  • Pricing requires a sales conversation rather than a listed plan
  • Broad enterprise scope may exceed a single-specialty team’s needs
  • Documented support is provided through documentation
  • Does not provide PACS functionality
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Relies on interfaces to send orders and results to PACS and other systems
Our verdict

Fujifilm Synapse PACS is an enterprise picture archiving and communication system for healthcare organizations and imaging teams. Its diagnostic viewer brings together radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology, and specialty-department…

Read the review →

Radiology teams in mid-market and enterprise healthcare organizations may consider Epic Radiant for coordinating work across an exam’s lifecycle. The application covers scheduling, technologist and nurse workflows, exam performance and…

Read the review →
  1. Fujifilm Synapse PACSRadiology Software 9.0Pricing on request
  2. Epic RadiantRadiology Software 8.7Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Fujifilm Synapse PACS — where it wins

    • One viewer spans radiology, mammography, cardiology, pathology, and specialty imaging
    • DICOM and non-DICOM access with zero-download web viewing
    • AI worklists support algorithm integration and study prioritization

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a sales conversation rather than a listed plan
    • Broad enterprise scope may exceed a single-specialty team’s needs
    • Documented support is provided through documentation

  • Epic Radiant — where it wins

    • Coordinates scheduling and exam workflows for technologists and nurses
    • Supports study prioritization, reporting, and follow-up procedure tracking
    • Dashboards show department and individual performance

    Where it doesn't

    • Does not provide PACS functionality
    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Relies on interfaces to send orders and results to PACS and other systems
  • Fujifilm Synapse PACS9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad enterprise PACS for multi-specialty imaging, remote reading, and AI worklists.

    Visit FujifilmFull verdict →
  • Epic Radiant8.7/10 · Pricing on request

    A radiology information system for coordinating exams, reporting, follow-up, and performance.

    Contact EpicFull verdict →

More comparisons

All radiology software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update