Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Virtual Meeting Room Software

Frame vs Arthur

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Frame #4 in Virtual Meeting Room Software 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Frame
Arthur #6 in Virtual Meeting Room Software 8.6/10 Free plan · pricing on request Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Arthur

Frame leads on 0 checks, Arthur on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFrame · 8.8/10
  • Free planboth

Frame scores higher on our rubric for virtual meeting room software: 8.8 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

On access controls, Frame gives you Role_based where Arthur offers Open.

Frame is the better fit for immersive meetings needing mobile coverage. Arthur is the better fit for enterprise teams needing secure virtual rooms.

  • Frame fits best

    Immersive meetings needing mobile coverage

  • Arthur fits best

    Enterprise teams needing secure virtual rooms

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Frame 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Arthur 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.6
Ranking #4 in Virtual Meeting Room Software #6 in Virtual Meeting Room Software
Best for Immersive meetings needing mobile coverage Enterprise teams needing secure virtual rooms
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $10/mo Free plan · pricing on request
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Support Email, Community, Docs Email
Compliance SOC 2 SOC 2, GDPR
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Enterprise
Features Frame 4/4 · Arthur 4/4
Persistent rooms ✓ ✓
Spatial audio ✓ ✓
Guest access ✓ ✓
Screen sharing ✓ ✓
Specs
Room capacity 8 participants Not checked yet
Mobile apps Ios_android Not checked yet
Access controls Role_based Open
Our review
Pros
  • Persistent 3D rooms with spatial voice and custom voice zones
  • Web, iOS, and Android access without downloads
  • Granular permissions, AI tools, and a REST API
  • Persistent host-independent rooms with guest access
  • Spatial audio, private audio zones, and breakout sessions
  • Private-cloud or self-hosted deployment options
Cons
  • Trial and Basic plans support 8 users in a Frame
  • Paid plans start at $10 per Frame monthly
  • Large capacity and branding require higher-tier plans
  • Pricing requires contact with sales
  • Platform coverage is web-only
  • Enterprise-focused scope may exceed lightweight meeting needs
Our verdict

Frame is a browser-based virtual meeting and collaboration platform for teams, educators, event organizers, and communities. It centers meetings and events in persistent 3D spaces where participants can use avatars, spatialized voice, text…

Read the review →

Arthur provides immersive 3D workspaces for meetings, workshops, training, presentations, onboarding, and other structured collaboration. Its persistent rooms remain accessible without a host, while participants can join through web access…

Read the review →
  1. FrameVirtual Meeting Room Software 8.8Free plan
  2. ArthurVirtual Meeting Room Software 8.6Free plan · pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Frame — where it wins

    • Persistent 3D rooms with spatial voice and custom voice zones
    • Web, iOS, and Android access without downloads
    • Granular permissions, AI tools, and a REST API

    Where it doesn't

    • Trial and Basic plans support 8 users in a Frame
    • Paid plans start at $10 per Frame monthly
    • Large capacity and branding require higher-tier plans
  • Arthur — where it wins

    • Persistent host-independent rooms with guest access
    • Spatial audio, private audio zones, and breakout sessions
    • Private-cloud or self-hosted deployment options

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contact with sales
    • Platform coverage is web-only
    • Enterprise-focused scope may exceed lightweight meeting needs
  • Frame8.8/10 · Free plan

    A strong fit for immersive meetings, with mobile access and persistent 3D rooms.

    Visit FrameFull verdict →
  • Arthur8.6/10 · Free plan · pricing on request

    A secure, persistent virtual room platform for enterprise collaboration and training.

    Visit ArthurFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update