Head-to-head · Icon Libraries
Flaticon vs Font Awesome
Flaticon leads on 0 checks, Font Awesome on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreFlaticon · 9.2/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresFlaticon · 4 of 4
Flaticon scores higher on our rubric for icon libraries: 9.2 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #4.
On style coverage, Flaticon gives you Customizable where Font Awesome offers Multiple.
Flaticon is the better fit for teams needing the largest searchable icon library. Font Awesome is the better fit for product teams needing mature cross-platform tooling.
- Flaticon fits best
Teams needing the largest searchable icon library
- Font Awesome fits best
Product teams needing mature cross-platform tooling
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Flaticon 9.2/10 Visit ↗ | Font Awesome 8.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Ranking | #2 in Icon Libraries | #4 in Icon Libraries |
| Best for | Teams needing the largest searchable icon library | Product teams needing mature cross-platform tooling |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | $99/yr | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Email, Docs | Docs |
| Integrations | 2 integrations | 12 integrations |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Flaticon 4/4 · Font Awesome 3/4 | ||
| Commercial use | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Figma plugin | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Icon font | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Icons included | 1.8e+07 | Not checked yet |
| Icon formats | PNG, SVG, EPS, PSD, CSS, BASE64 | SVG, CSS, SCSS, Sass, JavaScript, web fonts, SVG sprites |
| Style coverage | Customizable | Multiple |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Flaticon is a web-based library of icons and stickers for designers, developers, marketers, and other creators. Its searchable collection supports vector and raster graphics, while the icon editor provides controls for color, size, shape,… Read the review → |
Font Awesome is an icon library and styling toolkit for designers and developers working across web, desktop, and design workflows. It offers free and paid icon collections, multiple visual families, SVG and web-font assets, JavaScript… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Flaticon — where it wins
- 18M+ icons and stickers across searchable collections
- SVG, EPS, PSD, BASE64, CSS, and PNG support
- Figma, Google Workspace, and API access
Where it doesn't
- Free downloads are limited to PNG and require attribution
- Premium monthly billing costs more than annual billing
- Some individual resources may carry editorial-use restrictions
Font Awesome — where it wins
- Free and paid collections cover multiple icon families and visual styles.
- Hosted or downloadable kits support SVG, CSS, Sass, SCSS, and web fonts.
- React, Vue, Angular, CMS, package, Figma, and API integrations are supported.
Where it doesn't
- Some collections and capabilities are reserved for paid plans or Pro kits.
- Its wide feature set may exceed the needs of teams seeking a narrow icon set.
- Custom icon uploads are available only through Pro kits.
- Flaticon9.2/10 · Free plan
A broad icon library with strong format support, editing tools, and workflow integrations.
Visit FlaticonFull verdict → - Font Awesome8.9/10 · Free plan
A mature icon toolkit with wide format, framework, API, and design-tool coverage.
Visit Font AwesomeFull verdict →
More comparisons
- The Noun Project vs Flaticon
- The Noun Project vs Font Awesome
- Flaticon vs Iconify
- Flaticon vs SVG Repo
- Flaticon vs Hugeicons
- Flaticon vs Material Symbols
- Flaticon vs Tabler Icons
- Iconify vs Font Awesome
All icon libraries comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update



