Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Meeting Transcription Software

Fireflies.ai vs Bluedot

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Fireflies.ai #1 in Meeting Transcription Software 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Fireflies.ai
Bluedot #3 in Meeting Transcription Software 9.2/10 Free plan · 3-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Bluedot

Fireflies.ai leads on 1 check, Bluedot on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFireflies.ai · 9.4/10
  • Lowest starting priceFireflies.ai · $10/seat/mo
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Bluedot
  • Most featuresBluedot · 3 of 3

Fireflies.ai scores higher on our rubric for meeting transcription software: 9.4 against 9.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

Fireflies.ai is cheaper to start at $10/user/mo against $14/user/mo.

Fireflies.ai is the better fit for teams wanting broad, affordable transcription coverage. Bluedot is the better fit for teams needing flexible bot-free capture.

  • Fireflies.ai fits best

    Teams wanting broad, affordable transcription coverage

  • Bluedot fits best

    Teams needing flexible bot-free capture

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Fireflies.ai 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Bluedot 9.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 9.2
Ranking #1 in Meeting Transcription Software #3 in Meeting Transcription Software
Best for Teams wanting broad, affordable transcription coverage Teams needing flexible bot-free capture
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $10/seat/mo (best) $14/user/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — 3 days
Deployment Cloud, Desktop, Mobile, Browser extension Cloud, Desktop, Mobile, Browser extension
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Chrome extension Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Chrome extension
Integrations 100+ integrations 15 integrations
Features Fireflies.ai 0/3 · Bluedot 3/3
AI summaries Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Action items Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Speaker identification Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Capture methods Not checked yet Browser/Chrome extension; Mac and Windows desktop apps; iOS and Android apps; Apple Watch; optional bot; audio/video file upload; Zoom and Google Drive imports
Transcript languages Not checked yet Not checked yet
Export formats Not checked yet PDF; TXT; plain text; Microsoft Word; Google Docs; Google Drive
Our review
Pros
  • Free plan includes unlimited transcription
  • Supports 115 languages with live transcription and speaker recognition
  • Connects major meeting platforms, calendars, CRMs, and collaboration tools
  • Bot-free capture across browser, desktop, mobile, and in-person meetings
  • Speaker labels, summaries, action items, and AI chat in one library
  • CRM, ATS, productivity, API, and MCP integrations
Cons
  • Free plan limits AI summaries and storage to 400 minutes per team
  • Meeting capture is primarily bot-based across supported platforms
  • SSO, SCIM, audit logs, and HIPAA compliance require Enterprise
  • Free plan covers only 5 meetings over its lifetime
  • Basic limits each recording to 1 hour
  • Video, imports, SSO, and admin controls require higher tiers
Our verdict

Fireflies.ai is an AI meeting assistant for individuals and teams that captures conversations and turns them into searchable transcripts, summaries, action items, and meeting records. It supports real-time notes, live transcription,…

Read the review →

Bluedot is meeting transcription and note-taking software for teams that want to capture conversations without requiring a bot to join the call. It records from browsers, desktop apps, mobile devices, and Apple Watch, and supports online,…

Read the review →
  1. Fireflies.aiMeeting Transcription Software 9.4Free plan
  2. BluedotMeeting Transcription Software 9.2Free plan · 3-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Fireflies.ai — where it wins

    • Free plan includes unlimited transcription
    • Supports 115 languages with live transcription and speaker recognition
    • Connects major meeting platforms, calendars, CRMs, and collaboration tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan limits AI summaries and storage to 400 minutes per team
    • Meeting capture is primarily bot-based across supported platforms
    • SSO, SCIM, audit logs, and HIPAA compliance require Enterprise
  • Bluedot — where it wins

    • Bot-free capture across browser, desktop, mobile, and in-person meetings
    • Speaker labels, summaries, action items, and AI chat in one library
    • CRM, ATS, productivity, API, and MCP integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan covers only 5 meetings over its lifetime
    • Basic limits each recording to 1 hour
    • Video, imports, SSO, and admin controls require higher tiers
  • Fireflies.ai9.4/10 · Free plan

    Broad meeting coverage, live transcription, and AI follow-up tools at a low annual entry price.

    Visit Fireflies.aiFull verdict →
  • Bluedot9.2/10 · Free plan · 3-day trial

    A flexible meeting recorder with broad capture options, imports, AI notes, and integrations.

    Visit BluedotFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update