Financial Modelling Pro vs Sturppy

Financial Modelling Pro9.4Visit Sturppy7.4Visit

Higher score Financial Modelling Pro #1 in Financial Modeling Software 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 6 features Explore the product

vs

Sturppy #19 in Financial Modeling Software 7.4/10 30-day trial Free trial✓ 5 of 6 features Visit Sturppy

• Financial Modelling Pro fits best

  Deal-focused modelers on a budget

• Sturppy fits best

  Founders building investor-ready models

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Financial Modelling Pro 9.4/10 Visit ↗	Sturppy 7.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.4	7.4
Ranking	#1 in Financial Modeling Software	#19 in Financial Modeling Software
Best for	Deal-focused modelers on a budget	Founders building investor-ready models
Pricing model	Free plan + paid	Paid
Starting price	$240/yr	$199/mo
Free plan	✓ (best)	—
Free trial	—	30 days
Money-back guarantee	14 days	30 days
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud
Platforms	Web	Web
Support	Email, Community	Email, Live chat, Docs
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features Financial Modelling Pro 4/6 · Sturppy 5/6
Three-statement modeling	✓	✓
Valuation models	✓	✓
Scenario analysis	✓	✓
Excel add-in	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Accounting data import	Not checked yet	✓ (best)
Audit trail	✓	✓
Specs
Supported platforms	web	web
Our review
Pros	Free plan includes one project and 17 sector templates Supports debt, equity, mezzanine, convertible, warrant, and kicker structures Exports to Excel, PDF, and Word on paid plans	Three-statement modeling, DCF valuation, and one-click scenario switching Templates or blank-slate models with customizable operating assumptions Integrations with accounting, commerce, analytics, and CRM tools
Cons	Free plan is limited to one project Free PDF exports are watermarked Available on the web only	No free plan; Sturppy Planning has no free trial Founder limits teams to one workspace and five collaborators Premium costs $899 one-time; Agency costs $199 per month
Our verdict	Financial Modelling Pro is a web-based financial modeling application for small-business owners, finance officers, investment professionals, and deal teams. It combines integrated three-statement projections with debt and equity… Read the review →	Sturppy is web-based financial modeling and forecasting software for startup founders, small businesses, and growing companies. Its Planning tools support template-based or blank-slate model creation, custom revenue, acquisition, hiring,… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Financial Modelling Pro — where it wins

  • Free plan includes one project and 17 sector templates
  • Supports debt, equity, mezzanine, convertible, warrant, and kicker structures
  • Exports to Excel, PDF, and Word on paid plans

  Where it doesn't

  • Free plan is limited to one project
  • Free PDF exports are watermarked
  • Available on the web only

• Sturppy — where it wins

  • Three-statement modeling, DCF valuation, and one-click scenario switching
  • Templates or blank-slate models with customizable operating assumptions
  • Integrations with accounting, commerce, analytics, and CRM tools

  Where it doesn't

  • No free plan; Sturppy Planning has no free trial
  • Founder limits teams to one workspace and five collaborators
  • Premium costs $899 one-time; Agency costs $199 per month

• Financial Modelling Pro9.4/10 · Free plan

  A budget-friendly web modeler with three-statement projections and deal-focused analysis.

  Explore the productFull verdict →
• Sturppy7.4/10 · 30-day trial

  A focused toolkit for investor-ready models, scenarios, valuation, and financial collaboration.

  Visit SturppyFull verdict →